This almost assuredly will not impact an existing indictment.

I would recommend looking at the court filing from the special counsel. The ending of the the DC jury is just a tiny bit of it. And I don't think Gateway Pundit is reporting the big parts of this court filing.

https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2MnuO7I/x/c/4TwSOgQ59K5

The superseding indictment I'll go through a timeline of this, but the end result was that Trump got hit with new charges in a superseding indictment.

The Justice Department, in a new superseding indictment unveiled Thursday, is charging former President Trump with seeking to delete Mar-a-Lago surveillance video footage last year in connection with the federal classified records case. Trump is charged in the new indictment along with Carlos de Oliveira, the property manager of the resort and a new defendant in the case, and his valet Walt Nauta, who had faced previous charges.

The Timeline in DC and FL (roughly) The Mar a Lago case begins in DC and the investigation began in DC and the first grand jury was in DC.

Jan 2021 Trump leaves White House. Boxes are packed up.

2021 Presidential Records go to NARA, but they notice some are missing.

May 2021 NARA asks Trump to turn over any presidential records he has. This is the first request.

2021 There's several back and forths with NARA and Trump.

Dec 2021 Trump's lawyers say they found some more and return 12 boxes of records.

Jan 2022 15 more boxes are returned

"The boxes are found to contain 197 documents with classified markings, including 69 marked confidential, 98 secret and 30 top secret"

Feb 2022 NARA makes a criminal rereferral to DOJ.

So now DOJ is involved and by the end of April a grand jury investigation has started.

May 11, 2022: A grand jury issues a subpoena to Trump

June 2, 2022: One of Trump’s lawyers returns to Mar-a-Lago to search boxes in the storage room and finds 38 additional classified documents

The DOJ also gets the security camera footage from Mar a Lago.

By August a search warrant is obtained and the search occurs. The search warrant is approved by FL judge.

June 8, 2023: A grand jury in Miami indicts Trump and Nauta.

The TWO grand juries

So the investigation began in DC, witnesses were interviewed in DC, but the DOJ found the charges in play basically took place in Florida with some small exceptions. The documents were retained in FL.

This means that the special counsel had the take the evidence in developed in DC and present it to a new grand jury in Florida because the DOJ is alledging crimes taking place in Florida. The FL grand jury agreed and returned an indictment.

This recent document was about how the superseding indictment came about. In the recent court filing, the DOJ got the superseding indictment because they were looking into crimes in DC, specifically witnesses lying to the grand jury in DC.

This is the takeaway others are reporting. That a Mar a Lago employee who was going to be indicted for perjury got a new lawyer, retracted his false testimony and is now a cooperating witness.

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The aide — described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras — held the title of director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago. He initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C., that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

This Mar a Lago employee was originally represented by the same lawyer who is represented the Walt Nauta who is indicted.

The bulk of yesterday filing lays the case the the DC grand jury was appropriate - the testimony took place there- and again asking the judge to look into the conflict of interest this lawyer is now in.

The DOJ is asking for a GARCIA hearing, that is to determine if Nauta's lawyer has a conflict

The DOJ is saying Walt Nauta's lawyer might have to cross-examine his old client "Trump employee 4" as he testifies and legal precdent says this is "actual conflict of interest."

So yesterday we learned Trump Employee number 4 is a witness who testified about destruction of evidence. And his old lawyer is still involved in the case and might have a conflict.

Oh and the DC grand jury that delivered the superseding indictment is closed.