Salty Cracker and Wall Street Apes are now insinuating it. The op was a success, they've created a narrative binary where either space lasers did it or climate change (MSM narrative) did it. Meanwhile the much more likely story (strategic arson ahead of high winds + collusion with crooked state and local officials to mishandle the response on purpose) has effectively been shoved under the rug. Now instead of having the entire internet digging into that to possibly find some arsonists or conspiracies to mishandle response, they are instead "laser focused" on space lasers.
Of course, if the DEW theory is correct, this is fine. I just don't think it is.
endrant
Here's a report on the subject. I am taking it at face value. You get to prove it is all a lie (if you can). Denunciations, imaginations, and changing the topic are not elements of proof. (I pointed this out in a post a few days ago, but I suppose the down-voting was overwhelming.) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/maui-theory-about-blue-objects-being-saved-from-wildfires-is-baseless/ar-AA1fG2MX
Wow now i know youre a shill. Posting an msn article thats claims "its all been debunked!" as proof.
Prove it wrong. Where are you going to get your information from? Or do you prefer to live an information-free life, where favorite fancies are endangered by inconvenient truths? Your reaction is nearly textbook paranoid delusion. Imagination is not reality. You need to ponder that.
We have pictures and videos of blue objects surrounding by charred rubble. We have proof, you do not.
You keep claiming things as fact that you could not possibly know. The irony in your posts is so deep youre drowning in it.
Gee, blue objects surrounded by charred rubble. Including photographs of red objects that are surrounded by charred rubble. Said charred rubble consisting of all kinds of colored objects---including blue objects. There is photographic proof of formerly intact blue objects having been burned, and objects of other colors not being burned. You have only proof of "some blue objects were not burned." No proof that blueness was a magic protection against being burned.
What you are practicing is selective evidence in support of bias confirmation. If you want to compare facts and knowledge, please do so, but don't think that "DEWs set this fire" is any kind of proven fact. For you, it is an article of faith.