ANOTHER SMOKING GUN: Maui Fire Breaks SCIENCE as we know it…
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
These are just the facts. And the facts don't add up.
But the facts dew add up to something.
You don't have to tell me that, I know. But I'll be sharing your video because it's simple, straightforward, and leaves those unanswered questions. It's perfect. The goal after all is Awakening.
The facts add up perfectly fine as long as you add "space lasers" to the list of possibilities.
And why would you do that? There is no evidence for their existence. No orbit. No operational theory. You do realize that satellites zip along rather rapidly and would only be in view for a few minutes? The facts add up if you admit the behavior of flash fires in high winds.
Melted aluminum in an area where the ambient environment is such that any heat (such as a tire fire) should have dissipated away (thus preventing aluminum from melting) is exactly evidence of their existence. The aluminum wheels and the ground are both excellent thermal conductors, with the ground an infinite thermal sink unless there is a TON of fuel to heat it up. There is no way to melt aluminum with thermal energy alone without the entire surrounding environment being so hot that the boundary conditions between the aluminum and the ground are no longer a thermal boundary.
You could also take five seconds and look at designs for space based solar energy transmission. Such an investigation (beyond wikipedia, but it's a place to start) also addresses your "no theory," "no operational theory," and "satellites zip along rather rapidly" arguments, which are trivially shut down in other ways, but it's all nice and neatly rebutted in a simple investigation into space based solar energy, so I'll leave it at that.
You are speaking nonsense. What was available to burn didn't walk away. If the tires burned, the wheels were right there. You know it takes only a propane torch to melt aluminum---and it doesn't kill the person holding the torch. It was commonly done in my junior high school metalshop class. The only thermal sinking that went on was when the molten aluminum dribbled away from the fire and congealed on the ground. I think you are speaking beyond the realm of practical experience.
I know all about space-based solar energy transmission, since it was first proposed in the late 1970s, looking over the shoulder of Boeing's design work on giant solar panel arrays in orbit. I knew John J. Olson, the engineer who produced some splendid artwork on the subject. There are no such things presently. Moreover, their approach was to use microwave beams (not effective against metal) and at intensities a tenth that of sunlight. The designs had the satellites placed at geostationary orbit altitude and they were BIG, with dimensions in kilometers. Nothing like that exists, and we really don't know if they can be built (aspirations notwithstanding). All the current attempts at "proving" the concept involve satellites in low Earth orbit, where they indeed will "zip along rather rapidly." I've analyzed one proposed system, and it fell apart once the orbital and optical physics were accounted for. It also turns out that there is a very adverse relationship between the diameter of the satellite power aperture and the ground-based receiver aperture. They must both be big...and this has nothing to do with the amount of power being projected, so even a small-powered experiment will have an uphill test. Yeah, I would say understanding the operating theory and having analyzed proposed system examples constitutes "investigation" beyond what your quick scan provided. You flunk your rebuttal. It helps to actually know what is being talked about.