I think you're missing the context of my sentiments. There has been incessant posts and articles here trying to prove that Trump's pushing of the experimental jabs was not because of ignorance or that he wasn't perfect, he knew exactly what he was doing because its part of the of a white hat plan to kneecap the globalist plan to lockdown the world for 10 years or some bizarre scenario like that. THAT's what I'm arguing against, not that I really believe Trump must be perfect. Evidence shows he was outsmarted by big pharma, which means he is susceptible to failure at very high and critical levels. So, its something to consider when so many are assuming Trump is going back into office in 2024 and he's our only hope, etc.

Honestly, it would not have been very difficult to have promoted public health policies based at least on traditional vaccines with KNOWN risks and benefits, rather than complete unknowns trying to address a widespread non consequential highly transmissable pathogen. But when a president is only going on daily briefings with single page summaries of the facts of any given matter, it actually is difficult to get it right because he is completely susceptible to advisers and "expertise". So how does this fit into some 5D chess, really?