I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.
Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.
Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.
Pointing out logical errors are not personal attacks. Kindly point out where I insulted you.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar.
Sorry fren, if you dont understand that this deduction is logically erroneous, there is nothing further I can say to you. Its nothing personal, just logic.
adjective
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
adverb
in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
Except you didnt take any of my points and just said "this is illogical" and tried to say i was saying things i didnt (you asserted i called her a liar twice and i didnt) and then you go and say you dont know who we are talking about and want me to research for you (and in the same breath say you are thinking logically and im not).
You dont mention my points about her adding nothing to the convo and just relaying information, you just say "you arent thinking critically" which is absolutely ad hominem and not an argument or point and adds nothing to the conversation lol.
Trump reposted a lot of people who were obvious plants and shills. He was even on Alex Jones and we all know he is a shill as per Q. He reposted her talking about the election, specifically. That doesnt mean he supports her other claims.
Get a grip, people. We must use our own intuition and logic but not throw everyone under the bus just because of a couple of people whose shows they have been on. Every time someone comes to the forefront and we think we might be making some progress getting info, then all the nay saying starts. If your gut is not aligned with what she says, keep it to yourself UNTIL YOU HAVE SOME PROOF. You might be fighting AGAINST something 45 is doing. My guts says she is legit and aligned with the good guys for a good purpose. I don't have to swallow everything she says.......but I do think she has been brought out now to encourage the Patriots. EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS NOT ALWAYS NEGATIVE. DON'T LET THE NEGATIVE KEEP YOU FROM THE POSITIVE.
I think you are insinuating that ward is a liar. I’m not personally a follower of ward but I will say when Trump posted her interview that mentions those planes it was clear to me that the story is true.
Thats not at all what I am saying.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.
Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.
Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.
The ad hominem doesnt help your case by the way.
Pointing out logical errors are not personal attacks. Kindly point out where I insulted you.
Sorry fren, if you dont understand that this deduction is logically erroneous, there is nothing further I can say to you. Its nothing personal, just logic.
Look up what ad hominem means and reread this very post...
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
Except you didnt take any of my points and just said "this is illogical" and tried to say i was saying things i didnt (you asserted i called her a liar twice and i didnt) and then you go and say you dont know who we are talking about and want me to research for you (and in the same breath say you are thinking logically and im not).
You dont mention my points about her adding nothing to the convo and just relaying information, you just say "you arent thinking critically" which is absolutely ad hominem and not an argument or point and adds nothing to the conversation lol.
What do you think about the fact that Trump reposted her video to millions of viewers?
Would he do that if the information was false?
Trump reposted a lot of people who were obvious plants and shills. He was even on Alex Jones and we all know he is a shill as per Q. He reposted her talking about the election, specifically. That doesnt mean he supports her other claims.
Get a grip, people. We must use our own intuition and logic but not throw everyone under the bus just because of a couple of people whose shows they have been on. Every time someone comes to the forefront and we think we might be making some progress getting info, then all the nay saying starts. If your gut is not aligned with what she says, keep it to yourself UNTIL YOU HAVE SOME PROOF. You might be fighting AGAINST something 45 is doing. My guts says she is legit and aligned with the good guys for a good purpose. I don't have to swallow everything she says.......but I do think she has been brought out now to encourage the Patriots. EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS NOT ALWAYS NEGATIVE. DON'T LET THE NEGATIVE KEEP YOU FROM THE POSITIVE.
I think you are insinuating that ward is a liar. I’m not personally a follower of ward but I will say when Trump posted her interview that mentions those planes it was clear to me that the story is true.