No, they investigated his claims and told him what he can say without breaking laws and what he can't as a whistleblower eg individual program names locations publicly, but could in a SCIF but was denied one.
Not the IC but some department that all scriptwriters/movie producers who work with gov to make some part have to submit it to the dept to review what is and isn't allowed to be said publicly.
Eg. Call of duty games having killstreaks for over a decade now involving managing the live direction of a bomb of some sort by joystick, with advice from the military, that is now common in Ukraine with the drones but developed by us then for sure.
Okay rewatched the clip, we are both right, but he just kinda pulls that intelligence community investigation out of no where. I don't know how we can get proof of that and don't see that when I search for it, just other former intelligence saying he is credible. I can find the letter saying it about the whistleblower that led to impeachment 2.0 but not Grusch.
For all we know they can literally be saying the claim of there is a program being withheld from Congress oversight is credible with it being nothing related to UFOs.
What I said about Grusch getting pre approval on what he wants to say is also true thru the defense office of prepublication and security review.
So the intelligence community investigted Grusch`s claims/witnesses and found it extremely credible and (urgent)
No, they investigated his claims and told him what he can say without breaking laws and what he can't as a whistleblower eg individual program names locations publicly, but could in a SCIF but was denied one.
Not the IC but some department that all scriptwriters/movie producers who work with gov to make some part have to submit it to the dept to review what is and isn't allowed to be said publicly.
Eg. Call of duty games having killstreaks for over a decade now involving managing the live direction of a bomb of some sort by joystick, with advice from the military, that is now common in Ukraine with the drones but developed by us then for sure.
No .They investigated 40 plus of the witnesses _hostile & friendly _ and said it was credible and urgent....
Okay rewatched the clip, we are both right, but he just kinda pulls that intelligence community investigation out of no where. I don't know how we can get proof of that and don't see that when I search for it, just other former intelligence saying he is credible. I can find the letter saying it about the whistleblower that led to impeachment 2.0 but not Grusch.
For all we know they can literally be saying the claim of there is a program being withheld from Congress oversight is credible with it being nothing related to UFOs.
What I said about Grusch getting pre approval on what he wants to say is also true thru the defense office of prepublication and security review.
no worries fren