You seem to be under the erroneous idea that a law preventing two consenting adults from marrying or having sex would be unconstitutional, in yet you already know that no right is absolute. So explain how gay sex or gay marriage is unconstitutional but not incest or incest marriage? What about gay incest marriage/sex, since there is not birthing issue? Why is that not unconstitutional?
You can't marry or have sex with minors because they are not of an age that can consent. You cannot have incestuous relationships because there is a high risk of birth defects in children produced by such relationships. I would not care if consensual gay relationships between siblings were permitted but it would be unequal treatment based on gender.
The bottom line is that for cases of consensual sex or marriage between same-sex partners, as long as they are not illegal in other ways like incest or involving a minor, there is no legal justification for making them illegal when equivalent straight relationships are legal.
You're trying to gotcha me but all of these situations have pretty clear legal explanations.
What's the clear legal explanation for making incest illegal for gay siblings? I will do you a favor and tell you. Because all rights are based on moral law. Morality is a religious idea. Rights are only absolute when there is an absolute moral authority (god given), else they are given and taken by the ever changing moral ideas of the government. Many things are illegal due to morality including incest law, which has been around since before the idea of genetic abnormalities. As a society gets further from God, morality has no grounding and laws slowly allow for less and less moral actions to be tolerated. Eventually leading to a society like sodom and gomorrah. Where all morality it thrown out.
You seem to be under the erroneous idea that a law preventing two consenting adults from marrying or having sex would be unconstitutional, in yet you already know that no right is absolute. So explain how gay sex or gay marriage is unconstitutional but not incest or incest marriage? What about gay incest marriage/sex, since there is not birthing issue? Why is that not unconstitutional?
You can't marry or have sex with minors because they are not of an age that can consent. You cannot have incestuous relationships because there is a high risk of birth defects in children produced by such relationships. I would not care if consensual gay relationships between siblings were permitted but it would be unequal treatment based on gender.
The bottom line is that for cases of consensual sex or marriage between same-sex partners, as long as they are not illegal in other ways like incest or involving a minor, there is no legal justification for making them illegal when equivalent straight relationships are legal.
You're trying to gotcha me but all of these situations have pretty clear legal explanations.
What's the clear legal explanation for making incest illegal for gay siblings? I will do you a favor and tell you. Because all rights are based on moral law. Morality is a religious idea. Rights are only absolute when there is an absolute moral authority (god given), else they are given and taken by the ever changing moral ideas of the government. Many things are illegal due to morality including incest law, which has been around since before the idea of genetic abnormalities. As a society gets further from God, morality has no grounding and laws slowly allow for less and less moral actions to be tolerated. Eventually leading to a society like sodom and gomorrah. Where all morality it thrown out.