Trump inmate number Q proof, Part 2 - Trump's inmate number was in sequence and NOT chosen randomly - The Great Awakening

Trump inmate number Q proof, Part 2 - Trump's inmate number was in sequence and NOT chosen randomly Q-analysis!

posted 1 year ago by solarsavior 1 year ago by solarsavior +214 / -2

Part 1: https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2WGsvpb/heres-that-pesky-number-again-56/c/

My Q proof relies on Trump's inmate number being a specific number.

P01135809 (Trump's inmate number)

2024 election

1135809/2024 = 561.170454545

I searched through the Jail Records of Fulton County, GA and Trump's inmate number wasn't chosen at random to make the math work for my Q proof.

On Monday, August 21, Trump announced that he would surrender on Thursday, August 24. (where he would receive his inmate number)

Dividing inmate numbers in this range will yield 561.17(something), which isn't enough to say that's a Q proof. It had to be that inmate number.

I'm more speechless. Either the Patriots are that damn good with planning or we live in a matrix. You religious folks can even say it was divine intervention. Or I could just be wrong.

(supporting data in comments)

88 comments

88 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (88)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– tattletalestrangler 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm curious, did Trump make up the part about indictments that could jail him for 561 years just to point to this proof, or do the legal documents of the indictment indicate the total possible years could be 561?

permalink save report block reply

– solarsavior [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I just made a comment over here that addresses that. I’m contemplating a “Part 3” post, but I need to get ducks lined up.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17r995JvrU/x/c/4TwT1qsfos3

permalink parent save report block reply