You're correct. But it's a relatively small error, and the meaning is clear. Given the general inattention to grammar in the schools, I'm assuming it was a simple error without any strategic intent at secret meaning. In other words, a mistake.
Had to check. Seems to me that Q is more intelligent than that, so perhaps it was intentional. Maybe this is a hint at Q's age? (In my experience, younger people seem to adhere less to "proper" English.)
Not sure it means anything at all, but ....
"Those" requires "have", not "has". Can anyone run-to-ground this "s" to "ve" thing?
Or just laugh and call me a crazy polak.
Grammar pedantic
You're correct. But it's a relatively small error, and the meaning is clear. Given the general inattention to grammar in the schools, I'm assuming it was a simple error without any strategic intent at secret meaning. In other words, a mistake.
Had to check. Seems to me that Q is more intelligent than that, so perhaps it was intentional. Maybe this is a hint at Q's age? (In my experience, younger people seem to adhere less to "proper" English.)
I believe there are multiple authors. Maybe someday we'll know.
Interesting. May I ask your theory on this belief?
And if you really want to be correct, it should read "whom you follow".