The signature matching being unlawful would necessitate either a class action lawsuit either by voters or a normal lawsuit by electoral candidates against whoever has statutory authority over the elections in the state/county, I.E. The People of Maricopa County vs. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, since in Arizona, each county has a Board of Supervisors who hold statutory authority and appoint an Elections Director.
The legal standing for the lawsuit, as I understand it, would stem from the fact that the Board of Supervisors neglected to perform the duties of their office, and in so doing, defrauded both the citizenry of that county and the electoral candidates.
Very good question. IDK and not a legal expert, but I'm assuming nothing would happen to them bc at the time of the certification, the unlawfulness wasn't known. (Suspected and presumed, yes, but not "official"). Guess we'll find out!
I do recall the '22 election was certified by several counties "under duress." They knew something was up and wanted facts to come out but were legally bullied into certifying, thus made open statements "under duress" during certification.
so if the AZ election was unlawful, then those who certified it knowing it was unlawful, what happens to them?
The signature matching being unlawful would necessitate either a class action lawsuit either by voters or a normal lawsuit by electoral candidates against whoever has statutory authority over the elections in the state/county, I.E. The People of Maricopa County vs. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, since in Arizona, each county has a Board of Supervisors who hold statutory authority and appoint an Elections Director.
The legal standing for the lawsuit, as I understand it, would stem from the fact that the Board of Supervisors neglected to perform the duties of their office, and in so doing, defrauded both the citizenry of that county and the electoral candidates.
Very good question. IDK and not a legal expert, but I'm assuming nothing would happen to them bc at the time of the certification, the unlawfulness wasn't known. (Suspected and presumed, yes, but not "official"). Guess we'll find out!
I do recall the '22 election was certified by several counties "under duress." They knew something was up and wanted facts to come out but were legally bullied into certifying, thus made open statements "under duress" during certification.
It was known. That makes them complicit in stealing an election from the people of s rightful winner. Traitors. Death penalty.