Whether positive or negative we did give our energy to their egregore, their thoughts. Societally, at the aggregate, we did not say: NO!
Instead large swathes of the population complied out of fear.
To follow orders is to submit your own authority to someone else's. It matters not what the reason is. It may be a paycheck, fear for being excluded, total delusion, whatever it is.
If every person, as a majority, had internalized the frase: inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, what, would have happened instead?
Fear for loss, attachments are the shadows in Plato's cave. Yes, they played on our emotions. They programmed...they created the conditions of being able to accept that programming. That is voluntary com-pliance.
Think about this word: com-ply. Fold together, yield together. And what is yielding? Surrender. What is surrendered? Our own author-ity. What is an author? One who brings about, a creator. Does.that ring a bell?
In our pursuit to resist, we remained talking about their thoughts, instead of creating our own. And I am not saying that I am excempt from that . I did too, because, back then, I did not comprehend the energetic mechanics of the laws of nature. And, with the best of intentions, I unwittingly, submitted to their thoughts, despite the fact I was vehemently opposed to these.
These events taught me to become conscious of my own thoughts and emotions, in that it is not what I am against, but what I am in favor of, what I really care about.
So, yes, I now am more able to be aware of what they really are doing. I can see it.
Think back to Tucker's Trump interview when he posted the question: what is the next step?
Potus did give a non-answer. Why? Because he was not able too? Indeed, he did not increase the energetic strength of that thought! But we, unwittingly did! The law of cause and effect are simple.
Energy carries in it potential. Either positive or negative. Our emotions are played the moment we are confronted with an idea that carries resistance within ourselves. This is very dangerous. Because, at that moment, we are at a place were our bodies are persuaded to vibrate with something dis-con-cert-ing on a vibrational level!
The question then becomes whether this is on a higher vibrational level, a higher frequency, or a lower one.
The laws of nature proscribe the physical manifestation of where the frequency is. As the Bible says: the first word ( vibration/frequency) was light. And God saw that the light was....yes! Good! And that word was with God, and was God. And it became flesh and lived among us.
These are deep thoughts worthy of our attention, contemplation.
Therefore Q's warning: be care-ful what you wish for. Emotions cloud logical thinking.
Nah.... Wishes don't mean a thing, yes? Rational beings and all that? Does this mis-take for who we really are?
If the original word: light created everything, it follows that frequency and vibration (cause) tend to manifest as a consequence (effect).
So, right now, these people are putting out there a thought: we did no thing wrong. They are not saying: we did right! They appeal to a negative performance, blaming the victim they lead astray. What, emotions are running through our bodies? What do we vibrate with? Can we observe what happens without attachment, as if we are seeing a movie, conscious of the fact that it plays out on screen, and the knowledge of how a movie plays tricks on is, to appeal to our emotions?
If so, what then is our thought that directs or focuses our vibration to a frequency that is higher?
Are they now putting out things that are honorable? Friendly? Moral? Right? Isn't there some biblical passage in the New Testament about this very subject? What would Jesus do?
If faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the clear demonstration of things to come, what exactly are we hoping for, what do we see with our minds eye? That they escape judgement? Or that the meeting for judgement will be arranged? Are we creating thoughts that are in line with a higher frequency?
If we could prevent their plans by our positions as demonstrated in the past, what will happen if we could, in the aggregate, dial-up our frequencies and change the focus our thinking and care?
In the past, did we deride.the Amish for not having a television? Radio? Or other modern appliances? Or the rejection of modern medications? Is it not remarkable that among those people there are none who are affected with the egregore these people put out? Hence, the idea that throwing out your TV and radio prevents you from contracting covid.
Personally, I am at a position where I start to comprehend the game that is being played, and how it is played.
Contemplating Q's posts, George Washington's farewell address, and many other related writings, I have come to the point of starting to comprehend the game that is being played, and how it is played. And indeed, rights, virtue, and the cognition of who we really are, is in my view: The Great Awakening.
Gives new meaning to "I feel so drained today" or "I really feel energized today". We need to pay attention to what is happening in our world when we feel our energy changing.
Thank you for your addition. As always, reading carefully is of import. Hence, the description of my own process to counter balance immediate rejection under the pretense you so aptly wrote about.
In a convoluted way it is true.
To what have we given our thoughts and emotions?
Whether positive or negative we did give our energy to their egregore, their thoughts. Societally, at the aggregate, we did not say: NO!
Instead large swathes of the population complied out of fear.
To follow orders is to submit your own authority to someone else's. It matters not what the reason is. It may be a paycheck, fear for being excluded, total delusion, whatever it is.
If every person, as a majority, had internalized the frase: inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, what, would have happened instead?
Fear for loss, attachments are the shadows in Plato's cave. Yes, they played on our emotions. They programmed...they created the conditions of being able to accept that programming. That is voluntary com-pliance.
Think about this word: com-ply. Fold together, yield together. And what is yielding? Surrender. What is surrendered? Our own author-ity. What is an author? One who brings about, a creator. Does.that ring a bell?
In our pursuit to resist, we remained talking about their thoughts, instead of creating our own. And I am not saying that I am excempt from that . I did too, because, back then, I did not comprehend the energetic mechanics of the laws of nature. And, with the best of intentions, I unwittingly, submitted to their thoughts, despite the fact I was vehemently opposed to these.
These events taught me to become conscious of my own thoughts and emotions, in that it is not what I am against, but what I am in favor of, what I really care about.
So, yes, I now am more able to be aware of what they really are doing. I can see it.
Think back to Tucker's Trump interview when he posted the question: what is the next step?
Potus did give a non-answer. Why? Because he was not able too? Indeed, he did not increase the energetic strength of that thought! But we, unwittingly did! The law of cause and effect are simple.
Energy carries in it potential. Either positive or negative. Our emotions are played the moment we are confronted with an idea that carries resistance within ourselves. This is very dangerous. Because, at that moment, we are at a place were our bodies are persuaded to vibrate with something dis-con-cert-ing on a vibrational level!
The question then becomes whether this is on a higher vibrational level, a higher frequency, or a lower one.
The laws of nature proscribe the physical manifestation of where the frequency is. As the Bible says: the first word ( vibration/frequency) was light. And God saw that the light was....yes! Good! And that word was with God, and was God. And it became flesh and lived among us.
These are deep thoughts worthy of our attention, contemplation.
Therefore Q's warning: be care-ful what you wish for. Emotions cloud logical thinking.
Nah.... Wishes don't mean a thing, yes? Rational beings and all that? Does this mis-take for who we really are?
If the original word: light created everything, it follows that frequency and vibration (cause) tend to manifest as a consequence (effect).
So, right now, these people are putting out there a thought: we did no thing wrong. They are not saying: we did right! They appeal to a negative performance, blaming the victim they lead astray. What, emotions are running through our bodies? What do we vibrate with? Can we observe what happens without attachment, as if we are seeing a movie, conscious of the fact that it plays out on screen, and the knowledge of how a movie plays tricks on is, to appeal to our emotions?
If so, what then is our thought that directs or focuses our vibration to a frequency that is higher?
Are they now putting out things that are honorable? Friendly? Moral? Right? Isn't there some biblical passage in the New Testament about this very subject? What would Jesus do?
If faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the clear demonstration of things to come, what exactly are we hoping for, what do we see with our minds eye? That they escape judgement? Or that the meeting for judgement will be arranged? Are we creating thoughts that are in line with a higher frequency?
If we could prevent their plans by our positions as demonstrated in the past, what will happen if we could, in the aggregate, dial-up our frequencies and change the focus our thinking and care?
In the past, did we deride.the Amish for not having a television? Radio? Or other modern appliances? Or the rejection of modern medications? Is it not remarkable that among those people there are none who are affected with the egregore these people put out? Hence, the idea that throwing out your TV and radio prevents you from contracting covid.
Personally, I am at a position where I start to comprehend the game that is being played, and how it is played.
Contemplating Q's posts, George Washington's farewell address, and many other related writings, I have come to the point of starting to comprehend the game that is being played, and how it is played. And indeed, rights, virtue, and the cognition of who we really are, is in my view: The Great Awakening.
And this brings me to one last consideration:
What is the worst? Hate? Or total indifference?
Gives new meaning to "I feel so drained today" or "I really feel energized today". We need to pay attention to what is happening in our world when we feel our energy changing.
For a second I thought I was reading free-will-of-choice
Thank you for your addition. As always, reading carefully is of import. Hence, the description of my own process to counter balance immediate rejection under the pretense you so aptly wrote about.