Nonsense. There's 50 years worth of basis for doubt. Science is supposed to be repeatable, yet we cannot return. In the meantime "Climate Science" has proven the science community is easily corrupted by money, politics, and lies. Everything must be scrutinized and re-evaluated.
What a ridiculous argument. The Apollo program was an immense political and economic commitment. "Going back" was not about science; it was about political will and popular support---which was lacking. And (to play devil's advocate) why go back? We have more surface sample material than has been examined. The current plan to return is cluttered with woke objectives (sending the first woman to the Moon, and maybe also the first black person) and visionary objectives (the search for water and helium-3). I have misgivings about the mission architecture, but that's NASA for you.
"Climate science" deserves always to be in quotation marks---but it is not travel to the Moon. It is refuted by facts, not by suspicion.
Ah, so you have misgivings about NASA. That's how it starts. You'll get there someday perhaps. Anyhow, since neither of us is putting forth anything resembling proof, this conversation is stuck. Let's just settle for I hope you're right and move on.
Part of NASA is dishonest (climate change) and the rest is honest. I disagree with their program. I've held this view for decades, based on history and industrial experience.
There's plenty of "proof." I've found that the true dis-believers simply deny it, or have no clear idea what "proof" would entail.
Ok. Lets forget about the "proof" for a moment. What about the comms? Apollo 13. 13? Really? And ending it all on a 17? Good one. And they're not even trying to hide it now. Everything outta NASA is bent around the symbolism. Climate change is simply the 666 whining about all the heat being applied to their rigged system. NASA is just the mouthpiece that pretends to do things in space. Today my phone (another mouthpiece) informed me of a house sized asteroid that's approaching closer to the earth than the moon. What's going on in The House right now? Impeachment inquiry. Meanwhile, the phone helpfully supplied a David Gilmour article directly below for context. Apparently the inquiry's not gonna go anywhere near the Dark Side of the moon where all the "NASA proofs" are buried. Oh well. Thanks for nothing NASA.
Nonsense. There's 50 years worth of basis for doubt. Science is supposed to be repeatable, yet we cannot return. In the meantime "Climate Science" has proven the science community is easily corrupted by money, politics, and lies. Everything must be scrutinized and re-evaluated.
What a ridiculous argument. The Apollo program was an immense political and economic commitment. "Going back" was not about science; it was about political will and popular support---which was lacking. And (to play devil's advocate) why go back? We have more surface sample material than has been examined. The current plan to return is cluttered with woke objectives (sending the first woman to the Moon, and maybe also the first black person) and visionary objectives (the search for water and helium-3). I have misgivings about the mission architecture, but that's NASA for you.
"Climate science" deserves always to be in quotation marks---but it is not travel to the Moon. It is refuted by facts, not by suspicion.
Ah, so you have misgivings about NASA. That's how it starts. You'll get there someday perhaps. Anyhow, since neither of us is putting forth anything resembling proof, this conversation is stuck. Let's just settle for I hope you're right and move on.
Part of NASA is dishonest (climate change) and the rest is honest. I disagree with their program. I've held this view for decades, based on history and industrial experience.
There's plenty of "proof." I've found that the true dis-believers simply deny it, or have no clear idea what "proof" would entail.
Ok. Lets forget about the "proof" for a moment. What about the comms? Apollo 13. 13? Really? And ending it all on a 17? Good one. And they're not even trying to hide it now. Everything outta NASA is bent around the symbolism. Climate change is simply the 666 whining about all the heat being applied to their rigged system. NASA is just the mouthpiece that pretends to do things in space. Today my phone (another mouthpiece) informed me of a house sized asteroid that's approaching closer to the earth than the moon. What's going on in The House right now? Impeachment inquiry. Meanwhile, the phone helpfully supplied a David Gilmour article directly below for context. Apparently the inquiry's not gonna go anywhere near the Dark Side of the moon where all the "NASA proofs" are buried. Oh well. Thanks for nothing NASA.