Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
Its 2016, pre Q.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Connect the dots. I know I have.
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Its literally as simple as sending a letter/email
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
Nixon, ON TAPE, referred to Bohemian Grove as, and I quote, "The goddamn faggiest thing I've ever seen." Keep it straight, yo...