I will have to concede the likenesses are remote. I notice that the brows on 1.0 are prominent and protruding, whereas on 2.0 they seem to be flush with the forehead. Similarly, the upper cheeks of 1.0 are flat, and 2.0 seems to have bunching. Overall---and I find this surprising to realize---1.0 seems handsome (eagle eyes) and 2.0 seems unremarkable. If Fetterman gained weight, 2.0 is more credible. (Did Fetterman really have tattoos or just henna artwork? Artwork can be washed off.)
I will have to concede the likenesses are remote. I notice that the brows on 1.0 are prominent and protruding, whereas on 2.0 they seem to be flush with the forehead. Similarly, the upper cheeks of 1.0 are flat, and 2.0 seems to have bunching. Overall---and I find this surprising to realize---1.0 seems handsome (eagle eyes) and 2.0 seems unremarkable. If Fetterman gained weight, 2.0 is more credible. (Did Fetterman really have tattoos or just henna artwork? Artwork can be washed off.)