"Gold only has value because society says it does." That's true, in a way. But does anyone think that gold might be valuable due to the ancient, and I mean pre-Flood era? - The Great Awakening

130

"Gold only has value because society says it does." That's true, in a way. But does anyone think that gold might be valuable due to the ancient, and I mean pre-Flood era?

posted 1 year ago by TheMAGAnificent 1 year ago by TheMAGAnificent +130 / -0

I was thinking about gold and why it's valuable. I get it, "dollar will collapse, gold is always valuable," but WHY?

And then I was thinking about the ancient civilizations, the ones pre-flood that were most likely highly advanced.. The ones that most likely were able to tap into frequencies, magnetic fields, and had advanced techniques that was lost to man. Techniques that men like Tesla eventually rediscovered, but cabal agents came and told them away (hence Epstein trolling around MIT, but that's a different topic).

I'm wondering if gold was used as a method to tapping into the power sources in the ancient world. Like, it more efficiently stabilized frequencies and made power a constant in the ancient ancient world. Who knows, I'm riffing here.

We know gold has unique properties when compared to the elements, and we know it's already used in electronics, electrical wiring, dentistry, medicine, and radiation shielding. Perhaps the ancient world harvested it as it expanded their power, and then the Flood hit, people lost the technology, but remembered gols: "it's valuable because our forefathers knew it was valuable, and maybe we'll tap into that so let's keep gathering more gold."

Maybe word-of-mouth and generational story telling eventually forgot how to leverage gold for energy, and it became a relic of the past, still valuable, but the inherent reason was lost.

131 comments

131 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (131)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Plebbitimmigrant 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

It would in theory make sense. There being an inherent value to Silver, Gold and other precious metals and even Gemstones and why it became the earliest widely accepted medium of exchange between radically different cultures.

There being some inherent intrinsic value or use outside of physical beauty would explain human obsession with them.

And somewhere along the line. The knowledge of “why” those particular metals and gems were valuable was forgotten. All we remembered was that they were valuable and we should gather as much of it as we can find. Even though we don’t remember why it’s valuable.