I was thinking about gold and why it's valuable. I get it, "dollar will collapse, gold is always valuable," but WHY?
And then I was thinking about the ancient civilizations, the ones pre-flood that were most likely highly advanced.. The ones that most likely were able to tap into frequencies, magnetic fields, and had advanced techniques that was lost to man. Techniques that men like Tesla eventually rediscovered, but cabal agents came and told them away (hence Epstein trolling around MIT, but that's a different topic).
I'm wondering if gold was used as a method to tapping into the power sources in the ancient world. Like, it more efficiently stabilized frequencies and made power a constant in the ancient ancient world. Who knows, I'm riffing here.
We know gold has unique properties when compared to the elements, and we know it's already used in electronics, electrical wiring, dentistry, medicine, and radiation shielding. Perhaps the ancient world harvested it as it expanded their power, and then the Flood hit, people lost the technology, but remembered gols: "it's valuable because our forefathers knew it was valuable, and maybe we'll tap into that so let's keep gathering more gold."
Maybe word-of-mouth and generational story telling eventually forgot how to leverage gold for energy, and it became a relic of the past, still valuable, but the inherent reason was lost.
Diamagnetic materials can be used in magnetic levitation, but they serve as stabilizers, not the source of the main lifting force. This link has a good overview:
https://www.physics.ucla.edu/marty/diamag/
Maglev trains operate on similar principles.
As for why gold isn't used, my guess is that it's too rare/is required in other applications, its diamagnetic response isn't strong enough, or that it needs to be kept too cold to make it work. When it comes to magnetic levitation, superconducting materials are the key as they have strong diamagnetic properties. Most of them have to be liquid nitrogen cold though, so the current goal is find room temperature (or close enough) superconductors.