SCOTUS last ruling was they can only use the same precedence the Founding Fathers had at the time it was signed. Since there were no restrictions that dismisses all firearm laws.
Founding fathers smoked weed and wrote 2A. It does not say there should be limits for drug use. F-them for "lying on a gun application" that is not legal to begin with; from a government that ONLY LIES.
Shall not be infringed.
Now get Hunter for his REAL crimes. 1. Being Biden son. 2. Rape 3. Treason 4. Use of hard core drugs, this list can go on for a long time.
1 and 4 are not "REAL crimes" -- in fact you already pointed out that "Use of hard core drugs" is not something the government has any right to criminalize.
"Use of hard core drugs" is not something the government has any right to criminalize. In relation to 2A. It has no stipulations for whom can bear arms, nor the arms they can bear.
And I was being a bit comical with my points. We can arrest people for a phone call now.
And while conservative legal advocates lauded Justice Clarence Thomas's ruling in Bruen and have called for fewer restrictions on Second Amendment rights, major groups, including Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association, aren't coming to Hunter Biden's defense.
“GOA opposes all gun control, but so long as this President continues to use every tool at his disposal to harass and criminalize guns, gun owners, and gun dealers, his son should be receiving the same treatment and scrutiny as all of us," said GOA senior vice president Erich Pratt.
Biden the gun grabber is a hypocrite when it comes to his son and gun charges. "It's Different".
If Hunter gets the 4473 overturned and sunset I am going to laugh. And then laugh some more.
According to the last SCOTUS ruling they can only apply restrictions that were listed when the 2A was written. There were no restrictions.
Yep. Bruen.
That's why the Left is flipping the fuck out.
The West Virginia decision is nearly as monumental.
"Gun control" is Dead Man, Walking.
SCOTUS last ruling was they can only use the same precedence the Founding Fathers had at the time it was signed. Since there were no restrictions that dismisses all firearm laws.
Yes, that is the "Bruen Decision".
The leader of the Democrat party, poised to stand up for the 2nd amendment? What a movie!
Amazing when it comes to them or theirs how quickly the come around.
Founding fathers smoked weed and wrote 2A. It does not say there should be limits for drug use. F-them for "lying on a gun application" that is not legal to begin with; from a government that ONLY LIES.
Shall not be infringed.
Now get Hunter for his REAL crimes. 1. Being Biden son. 2. Rape 3. Treason 4. Use of hard core drugs, this list can go on for a long time.
1 and 4 are not "REAL crimes" -- in fact you already pointed out that "Use of hard core drugs" is not something the government has any right to criminalize.
2 and 3, of course, are another story entirely.
"Use of hard core drugs" is not something the government has any right to criminalize. In relation to 2A. It has no stipulations for whom can bear arms, nor the arms they can bear.
And I was being a bit comical with my points. We can arrest people for a phone call now.
And while conservative legal advocates lauded Justice Clarence Thomas's ruling in Bruen and have called for fewer restrictions on Second Amendment rights, major groups, including Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association, aren't coming to Hunter Biden's defense.
“GOA opposes all gun control, but so long as this President continues to use every tool at his disposal to harass and criminalize guns, gun owners, and gun dealers, his son should be receiving the same treatment and scrutiny as all of us," said GOA senior vice president Erich Pratt.
Biden the gun grabber is a hypocrite when it comes to his son and gun charges. "It's Different".