Well, do you understand the depth of the epistemic dilemma of citing a persona in the alt media as having a pure unadulterated moment of communicating facts about the entirety of politics and the media being, well pure unadulterated fakery?

Why should he be believed in that one moment over and against all other avenues of sensory data and information available to the public? Why isn't Charlie Ward's emotional rant in itself a psy op to get HIS audience hyper paranoid / anxious / in denial about real events happening in the real world? I understand you were cross checking with other sources, but really Simon Parkes and Juan O'Savin? They have the worst prediction records out there. I know, I used to watch their shows / interviews.