No prosecutor would win this case and the cops know it. The legal backlash would also follow suit against the department. It’s important to understand a large majority of patriotic individuals have left the profession and the remaining lot are npc normies, jackasses and Cabal surveillance assets.
IMO the sexting laws are a double-edged sword; I mean, prior to such laws, there were cases of underaged girls who had sent out naked pictures of themselves to boyfriends/potential boyfriends who happened to be18/19 and then, when the dude(s) forwarded the pics to their friends, they were charged with distribution of child pornography and branded as sex offenders for life, whereas the girls got off scot-free. I don't profess to know what the cutoff ages for coercion/solicitation/distribution ought to be, and surely, 11 is very young, but I do agree that those who distribute pornographic photos of themselves should be held liable as those who seek them.
Didn't say that. And not necessarily in favor of minors or even young people being labeled as a sex offender for distributing photos of themselves or others. That would depend on the context of each case. But neither do I think minors of either sex who choose to disseminate pornographic photos of themselves should not be held culpable.
I have both sons and daughters, thankfully, now adults. But both sexes were/are equally vulnerable to temptations, and frankly, stupid mistakes. I just think there should be consequences meted out according to the severity/frequency of the offense. Again, context is everything in such cases. I do not know how old was the man the father called the cops about, but if I were that father, I would have continued the conversation/pursued charges against the alleged offender via A LAWYER even IF my daughter could possibly be charged with disseminating pornographic photos of herself, as she'd likely not do it again. Could possibly save her from becoming an Only Fans spectacle later on.
No, the cops were off-base to be sure b/c their immediate response was to tell the dad she could be charged. That, IMO, is suspicious. They should have at least gathered the complete information about the person the father was complaining about first, and then informed him of the potential for her to be charged as well. To have "gone there" right off the bat seems breech of protocol to me. Again, a lawyer should handle this. Cops are culpable, too.
It is strange, but she might have a unwanted crush on a 18 kid. I remember a 15 year old girl having a crush on me when I was in my 30's. I wanted nothing to do with her.....
FACT #1 - Juveniles are RARELY arrested, and only then in cases of capital crimes. They are apprehended and adjudicated on court PETITIONS, not warrants for arrest.
FACT #2 - ALL law enforcement investigations start AT THE BEGINNING, not the middle of the incident. Yes, pedophilia is certainly a crime that must be addressed by an arrest of the suspect. The production of child porn, even by a child is ALSO a crime which law enforcement has no choice but to properly address and that means apprehending the juvenile on a juvenile petition and putting them in front of a judge for adjudication. This is not like a traffic infraction. Law enforcement has no authority or officer discretion to give this crime by the juvenile a pass even if they wanted.
FACT #3 - The laws are enacted by politicians that YOU ELECTED, not by law enforcement officers. Law enforcement officers are bound by their oaths of office; "I, [Name] do solemnly swear that I will support and maintain the Constitution and laws of the United States, and the Constitution and laws of [State] not inconsistent therewith, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of my office as Law Enforcement Officer, so help me God." If you have a problem with the laws then go bitch and whine to your politicians that YOU elected. Remember, start at the BEGINNING, not in the MIDDLE!
FACT #4 - Prosecutors win cases like this all the time against BOTH the pedophiles AND the errant JUVENILE despite what other uninformed and unknowledgeable cop-hater morons want to believe. Though the cases may be related they are not bound to one another for the purposes of prosecution as they are a different set of crimes with a different set of elements of the crime to be proven. Correlation as causation is not a consideration in this matter.
FACT #5 - The parents need to be arrested on CHILD NEGLECT charges for not properly raising their child. Like I said, start at the BEGINNING, not the middle of the incident. This is what happens when you think that a 'village' should raise your child for you.
No prosecutor would win this case and the cops know it. The legal backlash would also follow suit against the department. It’s important to understand a large majority of patriotic individuals have left the profession and the remaining lot are npc normies, jackasses and Cabal surveillance assets.
I don't totally disagree.
That should help the child understand the severity of the situation. Now go get the son of a bitch that was trying to get to her.
True
This, exactly.
Yes, it falls under sexting laws. Sexting
IMO the sexting laws are a double-edged sword; I mean, prior to such laws, there were cases of underaged girls who had sent out naked pictures of themselves to boyfriends/potential boyfriends who happened to be18/19 and then, when the dude(s) forwarded the pics to their friends, they were charged with distribution of child pornography and branded as sex offenders for life, whereas the girls got off scot-free. I don't profess to know what the cutoff ages for coercion/solicitation/distribution ought to be, and surely, 11 is very young, but I do agree that those who distribute pornographic photos of themselves should be held liable as those who seek them.
Didn't say that. And not necessarily in favor of minors or even young people being labeled as a sex offender for distributing photos of themselves or others. That would depend on the context of each case. But neither do I think minors of either sex who choose to disseminate pornographic photos of themselves should not be held culpable.
I have both sons and daughters, thankfully, now adults. But both sexes were/are equally vulnerable to temptations, and frankly, stupid mistakes. I just think there should be consequences meted out according to the severity/frequency of the offense. Again, context is everything in such cases. I do not know how old was the man the father called the cops about, but if I were that father, I would have continued the conversation/pursued charges against the alleged offender via A LAWYER even IF my daughter could possibly be charged with disseminating pornographic photos of herself, as she'd likely not do it again. Could possibly save her from becoming an Only Fans spectacle later on.
No, the cops were off-base to be sure b/c their immediate response was to tell the dad she could be charged. That, IMO, is suspicious. They should have at least gathered the complete information about the person the father was complaining about first, and then informed him of the potential for her to be charged as well. To have "gone there" right off the bat seems breech of protocol to me. Again, a lawyer should handle this. Cops are culpable, too.
It's possible the girl sent an unwanted un asked for photo.
It is strange, but she might have a unwanted crush on a 18 kid. I remember a 15 year old girl having a crush on me when I was in my 30's. I wanted nothing to do with her.....
I had no phone at the time and neither did she.
I don't think we have all the facts here. Cops must have reason to think she is at fault.
the PD responded https://x.com/JacobYurri/status/1703983505439625389
FACT #1 - Juveniles are RARELY arrested, and only then in cases of capital crimes. They are apprehended and adjudicated on court PETITIONS, not warrants for arrest.
FACT #2 - ALL law enforcement investigations start AT THE BEGINNING, not the middle of the incident. Yes, pedophilia is certainly a crime that must be addressed by an arrest of the suspect. The production of child porn, even by a child is ALSO a crime which law enforcement has no choice but to properly address and that means apprehending the juvenile on a juvenile petition and putting them in front of a judge for adjudication. This is not like a traffic infraction. Law enforcement has no authority or officer discretion to give this crime by the juvenile a pass even if they wanted.
FACT #3 - The laws are enacted by politicians that YOU ELECTED, not by law enforcement officers. Law enforcement officers are bound by their oaths of office; "I, [Name] do solemnly swear that I will support and maintain the Constitution and laws of the United States, and the Constitution and laws of [State] not inconsistent therewith, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of my office as Law Enforcement Officer, so help me God." If you have a problem with the laws then go bitch and whine to your politicians that YOU elected. Remember, start at the BEGINNING, not in the MIDDLE!
FACT #4 - Prosecutors win cases like this all the time against BOTH the pedophiles AND the errant JUVENILE despite what other uninformed and unknowledgeable cop-hater morons want to believe. Though the cases may be related they are not bound to one another for the purposes of prosecution as they are a different set of crimes with a different set of elements of the crime to be proven. Correlation as causation is not a consideration in this matter.
FACT #5 - The parents need to be arrested on CHILD NEGLECT charges for not properly raising their child. Like I said, start at the BEGINNING, not the middle of the incident. This is what happens when you think that a 'village' should raise your child for you.