I listened to the first 1 hour and 45 minutes where she has Dr. Halper-Hayes on.

I didn't hear anything earth shaking. Basically two women sitting around talking. It got annoying at times as a guy.

Two things did strike me though.

1. Tore mentions "quantum predictive analytics". It seems this is a term she made up. It reminds me of this segment from her documentary called "Enjoy The Show!" which I highly recommend. https://rumble.com/v1y5uzk-enjoy-the-show-global-psyop-tore-says-documentary-caacia-propaganda-mocking.html At the 3:42 mark we see an apparent fictional computer called the "T.O.R.E Quantum Computer". She later clarifies that it mean "quantive predictive analytics". Well, there is no such thing. She likely means "quantitative predictive analytics". She said that she dabbles (not her word) in this as an "amateur" (her word). I do find this interesting and I do think it has merit. Basically it is the ability to predict what will happen by consuming a huge amount of data, working in all of the psychiatry that we know about humans and how they make decisions, and running it through algorithms. We see this from the Barr announcement which she calls out. (I remember this when it was announced. It raised an eyebrow as being very much like the movie "Minority Report") Both of them talk about trusting your instincts when something is telling you something. I'm very intuitive and it has been my belief that people have access to computing systems that can basically see into the future with a degree of certainty by consuming huge amounts of data and running that data through algorithms. I am often shocked that the video recommendations on YouTube. In one case it seemed clear that one of my devices was eavesdropping on what I said, while a couple of times, including recently YouTube made a recommendation based on something I was thinking. I believe that is what Project Looking Glass is all about. It's not a time machine. It is a system that can crunch enough data to make very good predictions. I am put off by her use of the word "quantum". Quantum computers are good at certain things whereas classical computers are good at other things. Are they using quantum computers to crunch all of this data or is she simply using a buzzword as a paytriot. It just gives me pause. (intuition kicking in)

u/#q3585

2. Dr. Halper-Hayes talks about getting inside the heads of people you're debating. She gave an analogy that if we lived in a Disney park that liberals would live in Fantasyland or Tomorrowland. I think this is good advice coming from a "shrink". You can't debate emotions. What you can do is ask probing questions in order to get the other party to think.