I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)
the logic of this comment is bafflingly bad
I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)