I read MANY of the comments and replies.

The most common criticism is that since he’s a quantum physicist he doesn’t or can’t understand “climate science”

To attain physics Nobel laureate status one must:

A. Be blessed with an amazing mind

B. Be able to logically and quickly comprehend vast amounts of data

Hence, I am going to assume that regardless of the subject matter of the data such a person chooses to honestly and rationally investigate, they will likely arrive at the most reasonable (and scientifically supported) conclusion.

The secondary criticism is that he is funded by the oil and gas industry. Obviously 99%+ of “scientists” who support the “climate crisis” are funded by forces who stand to capitalize upon the public’s inability to think critically. If these “scientists “ don’t regurgitate the fake climate talking points they do not receive grants, funding, and other wonderful perks.