Yep. I left the Academia because most of them will write papers that have absolutely no use at all. It is the same in the AI field, I walked around in one of the best conference, only about 5-10% has some sort of impact. IN ONE OF THE BEST AI VENUES!!
I have been doing / creating a lot of impactful stuff in the industry. Been looking for job. In an interview, I had someone ask me why I'm not writing any papers on the work I did. I just didn't what to say. Like, telling him that a good scientist thinks for himself and doesn't need to know whether a project has a paper to understand that it works??
Andrew Kaufman, MD, has said that in his experience, most "scientists" or "doctors" who are asked to peer review a paper, do not even understand what they are reading, and could not tell you why or if an experiement was done in a valid manner or not.
Yet, they sign off on the paper's review, thus making it "peer reviewed."
Yep. I left the Academia because most of them will write papers that have absolutely no use at all. It is the same in the AI field, I walked around in one of the best conference, only about 5-10% has some sort of impact. IN ONE OF THE BEST AI VENUES!!
I have been doing / creating a lot of impactful stuff in the industry. Been looking for job. In an interview, I had someone ask me why I'm not writing any papers on the work I did. I just didn't what to say. Like, telling him that a good scientist thinks for himself and doesn't need to know whether a project has a paper to understand that it works??
Andrew Kaufman, MD, has said that in his experience, most "scientists" or "doctors" who are asked to peer review a paper, do not even understand what they are reading, and could not tell you why or if an experiement was done in a valid manner or not.
Yet, they sign off on the paper's review, thus making it "peer reviewed."