Looking at the cabal's actions over history, it appears to me that their belief system involving bloodlines and preservation of them over generations has allowed them to attack problems (for their preferred ultimate outcome) over longer timelines than typical human lifespan ( or alternatively said multi generational and incremental solutions toward the ultimate goal). Since generally populations do not think generationally and do not focus much on bloodlines, the population is unable to consider or fathom the slow incremental attacks on the population by the current and next generations of cabal members. So risk tends to go to 0% and success over time goes to 100%.
The reality is boiling a frog (population) fast has a high likelihood of meeting direct resistance and failure. Boiling the same frog ( population) slowly over multiple incremental and generational steps toward the ultimate goal has a high likelihood of going unnoticed and succeeding without any noteworthy resistance. ---Makes me think of why operation warp speed was a success for Trump as it accelerated the boiling events far too quickly and guaranteed substantial resistance would occur --
One might even argue that Andrew Jackson was responsible for preventing the first (more rapid) attempt to get the population to quickly proceed to where the cabal desired it be in a shorter timespan. Thus the failure there required they regroup and begin attacking again from a different point on a multi generational timescale.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end. The things the cabal didn't get immediately were not achieved because they were not possible to do or accomplish on the generation that composed the population at that time.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes because the framework (Constitution) allowed sufficient cover for them to operate and erode the freedoms and liberties understood by the people without having to be completely exposed in the process. Also, the constitution was substantially better for the cabal's ultimate goals than the preceding Articles of Confederation since it created a federal government with actual power which centralized the points of control that should be attacked to pave the way for their incremental multi generational plans.
Since the cabal generally understands what kind of measured multi-generational approach is necessary within a given generation to continue movement and inertia toward their ultimate goal, I would argue from that perspective the cabal did get what was realistically achievable.
Really I see the cabal as being backed by spiritual satanic forces (demons, principalities, Satan) whom do not age or die like humans and whom intend to battle Creator God for control of all domains (physical and spiritual (or perhaps alternatively described as higher multidimensional)). Given that the human bloodlines and families are serving and following these evil forces, the generational continuity of the cabal has been preserved far more consistently and more successfully than the typical non cabal affiliated family. I have often noticed that there is inevitably (typically at generation #3 or #4 if the original successful generation did not neglect their own children) a generation of idiots whom squander the previous successful generation's progress in moving their family up in society. This results in a reset for the family back to a typically average state compared to the general population.
This is probably the best analysis I have seen about the subject of Constitution, kudos. I do believe this deserves to be its own post on a slow news day (if we indeed have such days in the near future!)
I agree with the observation that Cabal is backed by satanic forces and operate on much longer time scales in multigenerational operations.
I also agree with the boiling of the frogs analogy, however, I would like to borrow that analogy and refine it a bit further to make a point.
Imagine this pot full of water in which frogs live, but the controls to heat and cool the water is inside the pot, accessible only to frogs. Further assume that the controls are very many, and each one increments just a little bit. Naturally, frogs would constantly be moving the controls, but the hot and cold changes usually cancel out.
The only way the Cabal can destroy the frogs is to trick the frogs into making changes to the controls so that overall changes to hot is more than cold.
So if things go smoothly, the frogs gradually keep making the water hotter and hotter, by their own volition, and not even realise it, until they are all cooked.
However, the side effect of this approach is that, there are always a small subset of frogs who are especially observant and who understand what is going in. They cannot stop it, because its a collective problem. Only way to stop it is to make all the frogs understand this design and this problem. An awakening.
Until then, all they can do is impart this information to a few others, no matter how small that number is, and make it part of their collective memory, so that one day it may lead to the awakening.
Infact, I would argue that in this system the only possible solution out of this is the awakening of a majority of the frogs. Everything else is temporary fixes.
So the problem boils down to - is the speed at which the frogs are being boiled slower or faster, then the speed at which the awakening could happen ?
If you agree that this reasonably represents where we find ourselves in this boiling frog analogy, I can make my next point.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes
While I agree with both of these claims, I make the case that this is just one side of the boiling frog equation - the speed of boiling. And the claims simply state that the constitution provided a way for the boiling to proceed.
However, the other side of the equation we should ask is, did the constitution also provide a speed of awakening? And whether this speed of awakening was faster than the speed of boiling?
And to that, the answer would be this:
The Founding of United States and its constitution is one of the very few human conceptions, that ensured that the speed of awakening was always sustained in the right amount to be able to ultimately be faster than the speed of boiling. The founding itself seared the ideas of Liberty into the very soul of the people, and the Constitution provided enough safeguards to ensure every boiling action produced enough friction to also sustain the awakening action.
In other words, without this Constitution we would never had enough white hats, embedded in all aspects of the society, no matter how deeply controlled by the Cabal, to such an extent that this ultimate Q operation was not only possible, but inevitable.
Looking at the cabal's actions over history, it appears to me that their belief system involving bloodlines and preservation of them over generations has allowed them to attack problems (for their preferred ultimate outcome) over longer timelines than typical human lifespan ( or alternatively said multi generational and incremental solutions toward the ultimate goal). Since generally populations do not think generationally and do not focus much on bloodlines, the population is unable to consider or fathom the slow incremental attacks on the population by the current and next generations of cabal members. So risk tends to go to 0% and success over time goes to 100%.
The reality is boiling a frog (population) fast has a high likelihood of meeting direct resistance and failure. Boiling the same frog ( population) slowly over multiple incremental and generational steps toward the ultimate goal has a high likelihood of going unnoticed and succeeding without any noteworthy resistance. ---Makes me think of why operation warp speed was a success for Trump as it accelerated the boiling events far too quickly and guaranteed substantial resistance would occur --
One might even argue that Andrew Jackson was responsible for preventing the first (more rapid) attempt to get the population to quickly proceed to where the cabal desired it be in a shorter timespan. Thus the failure there required they regroup and begin attacking again from a different point on a multi generational timescale.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end. The things the cabal didn't get immediately were not achieved because they were not possible to do or accomplish on the generation that composed the population at that time.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes because the framework (Constitution) allowed sufficient cover for them to operate and erode the freedoms and liberties understood by the people without having to be completely exposed in the process. Also, the constitution was substantially better for the cabal's ultimate goals than the preceding Articles of Confederation since it created a federal government with actual power which centralized the points of control that should be attacked to pave the way for their incremental multi generational plans.
Since the cabal generally understands what kind of measured multi-generational approach is necessary within a given generation to continue movement and inertia toward their ultimate goal, I would argue from that perspective the cabal did get what was realistically achievable.
Really I see the cabal as being backed by spiritual satanic forces (demons, principalities, Satan) whom do not age or die like humans and whom intend to battle Creator God for control of all domains (physical and spiritual (or perhaps alternatively described as higher multidimensional)). Given that the human bloodlines and families are serving and following these evil forces, the generational continuity of the cabal has been preserved far more consistently and more successfully than the typical non cabal affiliated family. I have often noticed that there is inevitably (typically at generation #3 or #4 if the original successful generation did not neglect their own children) a generation of idiots whom squander the previous successful generation's progress in moving their family up in society. This results in a reset for the family back to a typically average state compared to the general population.
This is probably the best analysis I have seen about the subject of Constitution, kudos. I do believe this deserves to be its own post on a slow news day (if we indeed have such days in the near future!)
I agree with the observation that Cabal is backed by satanic forces and operate on much longer time scales in multigenerational operations.
I also agree with the boiling of the frogs analogy, however, I would like to borrow that analogy and refine it a bit further to make a point.
Imagine this pot full of water in which frogs live, but the controls to heat and cool the water is inside the pot, accessible only to frogs. Further assume that the controls are very many, and each one increments just a little bit. Naturally, frogs would constantly be moving the controls, but the hot and cold changes usually cancel out.
The only way the Cabal can destroy the frogs is to trick the frogs into making changes to the controls so that overall changes to hot is more than cold.
So if things go smoothly, the frogs gradually keep making the water hotter and hotter, by their own volition, and not even realise it, until they are all cooked.
However, the side effect of this approach is that, there are always a small subset of frogs who are especially observant and who understand what is going in. They cannot stop it, because its a collective problem. Only way to stop it is to make all the frogs understand this design and this problem. An awakening.
Until then, all they can do is impart this information to a few others, no matter how small that number is, and make it part of their collective memory, so that one day it may lead to the awakening.
Infact, I would argue that in this system the only possible solution out of this is the awakening of a majority of the frogs. Everything else is temporary fixes.
So the problem boils down to - is the speed at which the frogs are being boiled slower or faster, then the speed at which the awakening could happen ?
If you agree that this reasonably represents where we find ourselves in this boiling frog analogy, I can make my next point.
While I agree with both of these claims, I make the case that this is just one side of the boiling frog equation - the speed of boiling. And the claims simply state that the constitution provided a way for the boiling to proceed.
However, the other side of the equation we should ask is, did the constitution also provide a speed of awakening? And whether this speed of awakening was faster than the speed of boiling?
And to that, the answer would be this:
The Founding of United States and its constitution is one of the very few human conceptions, that ensured that the speed of awakening was always sustained in the right amount to be able to ultimately be faster than the speed of boiling. The founding itself seared the ideas of Liberty into the very soul of the people, and the Constitution provided enough safeguards to ensure every boiling action produced enough friction to also sustain the awakening action.
In other words, without this Constitution we would never had enough white hats, embedded in all aspects of the society, no matter how deeply controlled by the Cabal, to such an extent that this ultimate Q operation was not only possible, but inevitable.