You said phone calls could "easily" be traced. It's wrong that you should fabricate language. I wrote specifically of the police having this technology.
Oh sorry, it's not "easily" it's "instantly", important distinction.
Anyway you should really try to learn more about opsec and obfuscation techniques that can be utilized to hide your traces on the internet before trying to speak with authority on the subject. Law enforcement, especially local police departments, aren't all-knowing and powerful.
"Law enforcement, especially local police departments, aren't all-knowing and powerful."
You said this. I never did. This has nothing to do with being "all-knowing and powerful". Again, the police know who the caller is. They have the capability to instantly trace and identify the caller.
This is common knowledge, especially around here. I see you are shifting your polemic from your averred 'inside knowledge' that "burner phones" were used and "using a spoofed number made over voip originating from a server in Russia".
My goodness, I requested sauce on this incredible information to which I am still waiting on. Then you wrongly claimed I said phone calls could "easily" be traced. As you already know, I never said this. You did. Now, you are claiming I do not know that the police have access to instantly trace and identify the caller. Again, it is common knowledge they do have this capability. Accordingly, most people here seem to agree with this statement.
You said phone calls could "easily" be traced. It's wrong that you should fabricate language. I wrote specifically of the police having this technology.
Oh sorry, it's not "easily" it's "instantly", important distinction.
Anyway you should really try to learn more about opsec and obfuscation techniques that can be utilized to hide your traces on the internet before trying to speak with authority on the subject. Law enforcement, especially local police departments, aren't all-knowing and powerful.
"Law enforcement, especially local police departments, aren't all-knowing and powerful."
You said this. I never did. This has nothing to do with being "all-knowing and powerful". Again, the police know who the caller is. They have the capability to instantly trace and identify the caller.
You don't know this and you can provide no evidence to support it.
This is common knowledge, especially around here. I see you are shifting your polemic from your averred 'inside knowledge' that "burner phones" were used and "using a spoofed number made over voip originating from a server in Russia".
My goodness, I requested sauce on this incredible information to which I am still waiting on. Then you wrongly claimed I said phone calls could "easily" be traced. As you already know, I never said this. You did. Now, you are claiming I do not know that the police have access to instantly trace and identify the caller. Again, it is common knowledge they do have this capability. Accordingly, most people here seem to agree with this statement.