I have not been following the story much.

The article you linked appears to me to be about the AG office talking to an appraiser. That is not a deposition, and you can see that the appraiser never "got back to" the AG office with other info.

That is an investigation of an AG's office, not a deposition in a court case (which, by itself, would not be evidence, anyway).

From your article:

James has accused the appraiser of failing to fully comply with four subpoenas she has issued

Clearly, this was NOT a deposition. It was an informal discussion within the AG"s initial investigation.

"Any suggestion that Cushman & Wakefield has not responded in good faith to the Attorney General's investigation is fundamentally untrue," a company spokesperson said Monday of the AG's allegations.

"The Attorney General's filings do not accurately depict Cushman & Wakefield's responses to prior subpoenas and inquiries. We stand behind our appraisers and our work."

So ... THERE YOU HAVE IT.

The author of the article wrote a MISLEADING TITLE.

The appraiser STANDS BY their valuations.

It is only the AG who doesn't like it, and the author of the article (Laura Italiano) who apparently thinks that biased articles is some sort of stand-in for real journalism.

Regarding Laura Italiano (click on her name):

her work for Insider's Enterprise news desk is focused on the New York investigations into the Trump Organization and on related stories out of state and federal court

Which means ... she writes false hit pieces on Trump.

Here are some of the titles of her other articles:

Does Trump know how many minutes are in a day?

Donald in Wonderland

Trump keeps asking to move his March hush-money trial date because he's overbooked with criminal trials

Trump rambled so much in an NY fraud-case deposition ...