First let us start with this post from Purkiss80:
Kamala will be forced to resign as VP, and sent to the senate to replace Dianne Feinstein.
Then, Gavin Newsom will be subbed in as VP.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9ftxp4z/political-author-greg-rubini-has/c/
Why do they want to remove Kamala? Why not just remove Joe via the 25th amendment and move Kamala in?
Remember when Biden told us, "We Have ‘The Most Extensive and Inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of American politics"?
I think he may have been referring to Kamala's husband and his connections to the vote fraud industry.
Here is a dig I posted in June 2022. It explains that Doug Emhoff (Kamala's husband) worked for DLA Piper and the CEO of DLA Piper was also working with Smartmatic SGO Group. Also, Smartmatic software was used in Dominion voting machines.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXpQQyZR/who-is-douglas-emhoff-that-is-ka/
Here is one of today's deltas 4782: This drop talks primarily about Clinton Foundation charity, however, notice DLA Piper is mentioned in lines 2 and 3.
First look at line 1.
- Family of 'supporter' hired @ CF engaged law firm(s)
The supporter is Kamala Harris.
The family of the supporter is Kamala's sister.
Did you know Kamala's sister worked for Hillary Clinton?
"Maya Lakshmi Harris (born January 30, 1967) is an American lawyer, public policy advocate, and writer. Harris was one of three senior policy advisors for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign's policy agenda and she also served as chair of the 2020 presidential campaign of her sister, Kamala Harris."
Lines 2 and 3 talk about the family/supporter engaging DLA Piper and payments to DLA Piper.
I would be willing to bet that HRC used DLA Piper's services in 2016 to assist in stealing the election for herself and then the Biden administration used their services again in 2020. That is how Kamala became Joe's VP pick.
The above Q post says follow the money, here is another saying follow the family.
Clinton Foundation
Dla Piper
Conflict of interest?
Follow the family.
CLINTON FOUNDATION AT THE CENTER.
I think if they tried to move Kamala into the Presidency there would be some vetting going on and the conflict of interest that Q mentioned would get exposed. The cabal realizes it would be risky and the best option would be to move Kamala to the sideline.
Remember, Q said we have it all.
Here is a added bonus:
Inspector General Michael Horowitz's Review
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
Check page 294 of the above link.
Look for,
Hillary Clinton & Foundation
Crime Against Children
WWG1WGA!!!
It's a good question whether Kamala Harris will be forced to resign. However, there are major hurdles to this scheme. I'll be the first to question why governor Newsom is set to debate governor DeSantis. It also betrays the rhetoric in the past between De Santis and Newsom. Now, we know their criticism of each other was all an act leading to this point. No one can claim the debate between Newsom and De Santis are breaking the rules for the primaries. Yet, they are indeed breaking the rules. The debate could be a 'dry run' for Newsom, and for setting up the 'Harris'-forced-to-resign' scenario. We'll have to wait to see how this plays out.
Concerning Kamala Harris taking the interim senate seat and resigning the VP position, Is it a big enough carrot to get Kamala out? What guarantees her senate reelection? Isn't Shifty Schiff running for this same senate position? It seems there's not enough "carrot" for Kamala Harris to take the bait. If she is threatened with a criminal investigation, what prevents her from 'spilling the beans' and telling the Judiciary committee? She may have leverage to remain in the VP position.
Governor Newsom has the authority to appoint an interim senator after senator Feinstein resigns.. The scheme calls for the replacement to be Kamala Harris. That is, if she agrees to it. Let's say Harris does agree to the interim senate position. Once this occurs then president Biden can hypothetically choose Newsom to be his new VP. However, both houses of Congress would have to vote for this to happen.
Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy is the lynch key for this to occur. In the Constitution under the 25th Amendment. It says,
I see this scheme as a clear 'quid pro quo' issue and therefore a dirty political act. I'm not sure of it's legality. In the least, it appears as a dirty mockery of the Constitution.
Republicans need to call this out now to end it before it grows roots.