You guys are grasping at straws. He says "a missile, a plane..." That is not recovery from a fatal misidentification, it is the recollection of someone on the scene who did not at that moment know what he saw---which was a plane that had been repurposed to be a missile. He could have said "a something..." and that would have had the same significance.
Is it that you find the truth (airplane full of passengers destroyed in a moment) so terrible, you have to dream up an alternate reality where it didn't happen...and then somehow interpret that "no kill" fantasy as being more terrible than the reality? You are turning your minds into pretzels.
Amazing. Have you seen an okapi? I haven't seen any okapis. Ergo, by your logic, they must not exist. (That was once the official position on okapis.) Please don't bother people with logical fallacies. Nothing more common in courts of law than persons present who didn't see anything. Caught on video. Witnessed by many bystanders and at least one person in flight. Clipped a light pole. Examples of wreckage. The problem is that you don't want to accept what is real. Your conspiracy bias is more important to you than the truth, which means you are dedicated to dishonesty. And you have a strange desire to trivialize the deaths of the passengers (in-flight hostages) as never having happened.
You guys are grasping at straws. He says "a missile, a plane..." That is not recovery from a fatal misidentification, it is the recollection of someone on the scene who did not at that moment know what he saw---which was a plane that had been repurposed to be a missile. He could have said "a something..." and that would have had the same significance.
Is it that you find the truth (airplane full of passengers destroyed in a moment) so terrible, you have to dream up an alternate reality where it didn't happen...and then somehow interpret that "no kill" fantasy as being more terrible than the reality? You are turning your minds into pretzels.
Troll
You realize, of course, that you only confirm my conviction that you are wrong, by resorting to name-calling. The ultimate in impotent objection.
^^^FED^^^
Amazing. Have you seen an okapi? I haven't seen any okapis. Ergo, by your logic, they must not exist. (That was once the official position on okapis.) Please don't bother people with logical fallacies. Nothing more common in courts of law than persons present who didn't see anything. Caught on video. Witnessed by many bystanders and at least one person in flight. Clipped a light pole. Examples of wreckage. The problem is that you don't want to accept what is real. Your conspiracy bias is more important to you than the truth, which means you are dedicated to dishonesty. And you have a strange desire to trivialize the deaths of the passengers (in-flight hostages) as never having happened.