Your problem is that you don't know what you are talking about. The ATM video that I saw had maybe one frame available of the full airplane, but what there was had the American Airlines livery...and it was the right size compared to the height of the Pentagon. The final hole was much larger than the fuselage diameter. Since they found components of the engines, the facts are more important than your imagination. The wings folding is quite reasonable, as they were designed to withstand the drag force of air, not the drag force of concrete, which is over a thousand times denser. The leading edge of the wing is NOT the strongest part of the airframe. The strong parts are the wing box beam that is in the fuselage, and the wing beams themselves, which are all designed to support lift and gravity loads---not crashing into concrete. This is consistent with the mid-air crash of a B-25 into the Empire State Building in 1945.
The objections are: the video captured an American Airlines airplane; multiple ground and aloft witnesses saw the airplane, the airplane wing clipped off a streetlamp (which would have fatally damaged a cruise missile); there was no explosion, just a fireball from ignited jet fuel; the AA flight was tracked by radar from takeoff to collision; the passengers are dead and gone; there was aircraft wreckage found in the debris. All of these are facts.
Your "findings" are all imaginary. You misconstrue an airplane to be some unspecified "cruise missile" on the strength of a blurry image. You ignore the fact that had a cruise missile clipped a streetlight, it would have been fatally deflected from its path (cruise missile wings are strong for their size, but not much bigger than a surfboard). You ignore the fact that even terrain-following cruise missiles do not fly so low---because they would encounter fatal obstacles. You ignore the fact that precision attack cruise missiles dive at their target (in order to minimize the effect of height error on miss distance). So, your "findings" are a mixture of wishful thinking and ignorance.
Your problem is that you don't know what you are talking about. The ATM video that I saw had maybe one frame available of the full airplane, but what there was had the American Airlines livery...and it was the right size compared to the height of the Pentagon. The final hole was much larger than the fuselage diameter. Since they found components of the engines, the facts are more important than your imagination. The wings folding is quite reasonable, as they were designed to withstand the drag force of air, not the drag force of concrete, which is over a thousand times denser. The leading edge of the wing is NOT the strongest part of the airframe. The strong parts are the wing box beam that is in the fuselage, and the wing beams themselves, which are all designed to support lift and gravity loads---not crashing into concrete. This is consistent with the mid-air crash of a B-25 into the Empire State Building in 1945.
The objections are: the video captured an American Airlines airplane; multiple ground and aloft witnesses saw the airplane, the airplane wing clipped off a streetlamp (which would have fatally damaged a cruise missile); there was no explosion, just a fireball from ignited jet fuel; the AA flight was tracked by radar from takeoff to collision; the passengers are dead and gone; there was aircraft wreckage found in the debris. All of these are facts.
Your "findings" are all imaginary. You misconstrue an airplane to be some unspecified "cruise missile" on the strength of a blurry image. You ignore the fact that had a cruise missile clipped a streetlight, it would have been fatally deflected from its path (cruise missile wings are strong for their size, but not much bigger than a surfboard). You ignore the fact that even terrain-following cruise missiles do not fly so low---because they would encounter fatal obstacles. You ignore the fact that precision attack cruise missiles dive at their target (in order to minimize the effect of height error on miss distance). So, your "findings" are a mixture of wishful thinking and ignorance.