October 4th National Emergency Alert Test
(www.usatoday.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Ever wonder whether the cell phone towers in Lahaina, Maui were used to start the fires in all those homes? What amount of energy would it take to vibrate the wiring in those homes?
No too many people know it was probably DEW. Too much in your face evidence.
You mean "circumstantial" evidence. If it was just "evidence", there'd be a pathway using the courts. As it stands, it has the appearance of a conspiracy theory. We need hardcore evidence to overcome this narrative. Otherwise, it will be used to discredit everyone who questions the official narrative.
Also, if we discuss only safe stuff we won't get anywhere. We do a lot of theorizing and searching for clues and answers. The evidence has been shown on this site, and discussed a lot.
Foremost, we want remedy for the Lahaina, Maui residents that lost loved ones and their homes to this act of terror. No one is really denying that this is a possibility. Personally, I believe the possibility of it, but also recognize this has next to no feet to travel with the public. The reason for this is what you call "evidence" is really circumstantial evidence.... Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference that the fact exists. It's easy to test this by whether the evidence raises more questions than answers. Circumstantial evidence always raises more questions. It is for this reason it is not allowed in a court of law.
This happens also to be the 'opening' used by the authorities (perpetrators and enforcers) to respond by calling out publicly the need to suppress free speech.... "These 'conspiracy theories' are dangerous to our democracy"...... The government has a monopoly on the use of 'plausible deniability'.
Ever notice the guilty have the loudest voices for censorship? To resolve any crime you follow the facts. In this case, the most glaring facts are found in the growing cover-up. This is becoming the prima facie evidence and prime mover for getting to the bottom of all of this. The last thing anyone should do is give the criminal a weapon to use against those seeking to solve a crime.
If you are going to entertain the theory that DEW was used, you need to find the equipment used. Just like in a murder case, the weapon used is paramount for the prosecution to proceed. Where is the DEW equipment that caused this deadly conflagration? If you can't provide the weapon as evidence, you better have eye-witnesses that witnessed those perpetrators responsible for carrying out the crime. Who was behind this heinous act?
These questions are left unanswered and following this path is IMHO the most difficult path for bringing the criminals to justice. On the other hand, the following are the obvious things the public can easily acknowledge and pursue. So far, we have learned:
Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.
There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.
The water was turned off.
No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.
The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.
Over a thousand people died as a result.
The cover-up has become blatantly obvious and provides the best pathway for getting people to talk in exchange for a plea deal. Perhaps, the DEW question will be leaked. Then, this can be exposed.
I have seen enough to know those fires are in no way natural, so have many, many others. There is a lot of evidence if you look. Conspiracy is a term brought to us from the CIA. The white hats have all the evidence, I believe they also relocated the families, because the missing busses showed up the military base nearby. How easy would it be to put them somewhere in the mainland with new people showing up all the time.
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact in issue but gives rise to a logical inference that the fact exists. That's what you have here with the DEW theory. No one is really denying that this is a possibility. Personally, I believe the possibility of it, but also recognize this has next to no feet to travel with the public. See my other response for a more detailed explanation.
Also the wires in your home vibrate when in use. Building codes require shields going into and out of the gang boxes. Many cars have to be rewired when they get old due to the rubber protecting the wires wears out from vibration.
Quite right. Cell phone transmissions are in the microwave range of frequency. A long time ago, I worked on missile guidance radars, to which could beam over a million watts of energy into directed space. Any seagull flying in front of the radar would drop out of the air fried and dead. Microwave energy agitates metal through vibration..... What if cell phone towers could be used by significantly increasing their power input? What would happen to electrical wiring in homes and buildings? Is it a coincidence that the 2nd largest DEW research military facility is located in Maui?
People theorize that DEWs were used in Lahaina. They say, "Look at these oddities. No way a natural fire can do this. Therefore. it was must be DEW technology that caused it." This however, isn't evidence at all and is more closer to speculation than anything else. Yet, something did happen in Lahaina that is beyond explanation. What was it? Okay. All possibilities should be considered, including the DEW theory. We need hard evidence that DEWS were used. We would have to locate the equipment used for the crime to be carried out. The first question needing to be asked is, What was the origin of the DEW technology? Some people say satellites. Other's say airplanes, and yet other people think drones were used. Let's take a look at these. First. Satellites have a very short time window of being over the target. This becomes especially problematic with the amount of time it would take to destroy so much. Secondly, the amount of energy it would take to 'beam' such a destructive force from the distance of space is not plausible. I don't know of any evidence of this ever being accomplished from space. Yes, I have seen the ground-to-air lasers taking out an in flight missile and aircraft. However, the payload of such technology becomes very difficult to overcome for rocketry....think of large transformers and you'll get the idea. Two. Drones have the same problem and the nagging issue of the high winds at the time. People would have seen these and no one ever made any reports of drones flying over Lahaina, so the idea isn't very plausible. Three. Airplanes have the same hurricane wind problem. Yes, airplanes can navigate in hurricane level winds, but this is still perilous and the flight path is restricted to straight line endeavors. Also, no one reported seeing airplanes or even hearing them. would have been noticed. The sound of an airplane is revealing. This leaves us with the question of what source were DEWS somehow used in Lahaina? Until this question is answered, the DEW theory is just another conspiracy theory and ought to be avoided. Our enemies will use it against anyone questioning the "official" narrative.