Which is corrected in the article I posted, that EraofLight guy used and credited incompletely. I can't help what headlines people use, or how sloppy they are journalistically. Many fall into the trap of not actually reading the article, and going by an inaccurate title.
This link is sloppy too. Smartmatic has not been indicted.
All these blogs are playing off this story
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/22/business/smartmatic-bribery-scheme-indictment/index.html
The link I posted has the caveat if you scroll through.
Yes but they say this.
Which is false.
There might be Indictments against the 4 Smartmatic employees down the road or they may have agreed to give evidence.
But they have not been indicted
Which is corrected in the article I posted, that EraofLight guy used and credited incompletely. I can't help what headlines people use, or how sloppy they are journalistically. Many fall into the trap of not actually reading the article, and going by an inaccurate title.
https://goldenageofgaia.com/2023/09/29/smartmatic-faces-federal-grand-jury-indictment-for-illegal-activities/
It doesn't seem corrected.
It seems like the article is saying both and not even realizing that