https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified
For more details on #Plasmidgate outside of twitter I would refer you to the original substack from Kevin McKernan here and the whole testimony of Dr Phillip Buckhaults here.
Just for background, it’s important to know what plasmid DNA is - it’s the lab-based circular DNA particles that is replicated in big vats of poo and then used to create the mRNA that goes into your “short lived” vaccine.
It’s a lab tool so should never be in a drug injected into a human. It’s not allowed to be there. It’s like having a drug that requires arsenic as a substrate to make it, and then throwing the leftover arsenic into the actual drug that gets injected into you.
But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide).
It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA).
You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?
. . . Summary
I’ve come to the end of this little trip around the “mRNA” COVID vaccine sequences and their
intentionalabsolutely coincidental properties that make transfer of their plasmid DNA into the genome highly likely. And of course this is dose dependent so the more doses you have the more likely the plasmid fragments will be to integrate into your genomic DNA.Fortunately they thought about all this when they rolled out the therapy and they also thought about the impact in gametes (sperm and egg cells) which would pass on that signal to the next generation.
And on that note I will leave you with an excellent graphic from an anoymous(e) twitter account which should give you an idea of the scale of the problem that we could be dealing with in terms of heritability of these DNA fragments.
(Jaw-dropping graphic follows)
This is really interesting information and raises many questions. The following is an attempt to amplify the message on how delicate our genetics really are. I'll start with a startling case that opened my eyes to this alarming issue.
In one case after a bone marrow transplant, a man with leukemia found that his donor’s DNA traveled to unexpected parts of his body. Three months after his bone marrow transplant, Chris Long of Reno, Nev., learned that the DNA in his blood had changed. It had all been replaced by the DNA of his donor, a German man he had never met in person, but exchanged just a handful of messages with. The DNA traveled through the recipient's body and overwrote his own reproductive DNA.
Astounding? Yes. And I believe this type of thing is far more pervasive than in this single case. It is most likely this has a wide ranging effect involving many variables and degrees of its occurring in other people. Another form of this phenomena has been found to occur in former sexual relationships occurring many years ago. In 2019, the Journal "Science" was astounded to discover females are tainted by past DNA leaking across the placenta barrier (Fetal microchimerism) and past sperm DNA snippets. If this occurs in a several cell layered placenta, a one cell-thick intestinal wall would easily surpass this for DNA leakage. Far more shocking was thousands of 'mystery' RNA strands were found in male primate sperm.
Basically, DNA/sperm can survive outside of the womb and if it gets into the bloodstream it travels though out the body and can survive for decades depending on its end destination. For example, a study found the DNA of their partners in the brains of women who were nulligravid (never pregnant) some 38 years later. There is no white blood cell protection in brain or spine ever to patrol brain invaders.
Women may carry the DNA of all their sexual partners. And this is true for homosexuals too. It could alter the way the human mind works, similarly to how many animal life forms can alter the frontal lobes of mammalian brains. Typically these are exemplified with Toxoplasma gondii, and Ophiocordyceps unilateralis. Both of these get across blood-brain barrier via total invasion, as opposed to surreptitious snippets of free floating proteins. However, one study indicates the DNA from sperm of ex-partners lingers In female flies and influences the genetics of her offspring .
Homosexual males are by definition hyper-sexual and have several chance sexual encounters each week. Sodomy is the greatest disease spreading vector there is and is an alarming public health issue. Added to the already long list of maladies that homosexuals have to contend with, Monkeypox is yet another disease. Since sodomy involves repeated trauma to the intestinal wall, which by the way, is only one cell in thickness compared to the several cell layers existing for a female's placenta, the unnatural act of forcing objects into the rectum easily ruptures it causing many deleterious issues to occur. Fecal matter escaping into the body cavity is life threatening, but bleeding presents even more complications.
Besides the obvious pathway for disease to be transmitted from fecal matter mixing with blood. Sperm entering the blood stream is another matter that is not ever reported. There is far more to this and involves what is called 'microchimerism'. The science on this subject is greatly censored. But, certain published studies provide insight to the censored topics.
Studies show sperm lives only 8 days in a primate, but the haploid sperm DNA, which is not technically living, and is bioactive for thousands of years, and the RNA mystery large payload in every sperm cell, are thought to modify female bodies by altering and flipping proteins sitting on DNA strands, called "histone bodies" which allow the now shocking and newly discovered 'Epigenetic Data Inheritance'. This means animal life forms store and pass inherited traits not coded in DNA, and can pass it four generations forthwhile. Females with no sons and, in fact, no embryos of any kind ever, have DNA in their bodies and brains from men's sperm alone. I premise that homosexuals are also very susceptible to these circumstances involving microchimerism. It could be argued that microchimerism could be a reason for homosexuality.
When a woman has intercourse with a man not of her genetic background, the consequences may be deleterious and harmful to the health of the mother and baby. This may not be readily apparent, but in time reveals itself physically and/or psychologically. These cells/DNA from a different sex partner are often in conflict and are attacked through what is known as a cytokine storm. The body's own immune system becomes the greatest threat to longevity of the female (and baby). The health consequences can be immediate and neuro-immunological diseases involving inflammation are evident through many diseases producing systemic sepsis, as defined by persistent hypotension, hyper- or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and often thrombocytopenia. Viral, bacterial, and fungal pulmonary infections all cause the sepsis syndrome, and these etiological agents are difficult to differentiate on clinical grounds. In some cases, persistent tissue damage without severe microbial infection in the lungs also is associated with a cytokine storm and clinical manifestations that mimic sepsis syndrome. In addition to lung infections, the cytokine storm is a consequence of severe infections in the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, central nervous system, skin, joint spaces, and other sites. Other diseases take hold many, many years later.
The consequences are always the same. It is not ever publicly reported or acknowledged, but censored and covered up. For homosexuals the same conditions apply are far more apt to neuro-immunological and psychological diseases. Even the children from bi-sexual relationships are at risk. Add the vector of disease spread through sodomy and we have a radioactive bomb ready to explode for generations to come.
Earlier I mentioned a woman having intercourse with a man not of her genetic background has microchimeric consequences that may be deleterious and harmful to the health of the mother and baby. This may not be readily evident, but instead reveals itself later on physically and/or psychologically. As genotypes become more divergent, the resultant fertilization develops into more immediate and deleterious health issues, to which miscarriages, abnormalities and defects may appear. Sterility may one of these outcomes. These resultant consequences and others in humans are never properly associated to the dissimilar genotypes of the parents. To take it a step further, we are well acquainted with hybridity programs in husbandry, also in zoological mammalian reproductive programs, and its aftermath when vastly differing genotypes are too genetically distant. It is only plausible to consider microchimerism as a mechanism of God’s design and provides insight to what the bible teaches.
Interesting and as you say, startling. I stopped reading after a paragraph or two and it took me some time to come back and finish your comment. I'd already had my quota of horrifying news for the week, I guess.
On the other hand, actual harm seems more implied than directly supported here; many modern humans have DNA from Neanderthals, from Denisovans, and for that matter MUCH of our DNA is shared with "lower" lifeforms going back to plants and one-celled animals -- not to mention all the interbreeding among human groups from around the world as people travel, which is ramping up in the modern age but hardly anything new.
Overall, the effects of broadening the human DNA library may not only prevent problems from inbreeding but gradually strengthen the species.
But when you're talking artificially created DNA sequences, all bets are off. And that IS what we're talking about with the mRNA bio-weapons.
In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.
Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the anthropological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.
Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are very different (from those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identity has located populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this and suggest they are not human?
Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.