https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified
For more details on #Plasmidgate outside of twitter I would refer you to the original substack from Kevin McKernan here and the whole testimony of Dr Phillip Buckhaults here.
Just for background, it’s important to know what plasmid DNA is - it’s the lab-based circular DNA particles that is replicated in big vats of poo and then used to create the mRNA that goes into your “short lived” vaccine.
It’s a lab tool so should never be in a drug injected into a human. It’s not allowed to be there. It’s like having a drug that requires arsenic as a substrate to make it, and then throwing the leftover arsenic into the actual drug that gets injected into you.
But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide).
It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA).
You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?
. . . Summary
I’ve come to the end of this little trip around the “mRNA” COVID vaccine sequences and their
intentionalabsolutely coincidental properties that make transfer of their plasmid DNA into the genome highly likely. And of course this is dose dependent so the more doses you have the more likely the plasmid fragments will be to integrate into your genomic DNA.Fortunately they thought about all this when they rolled out the therapy and they also thought about the impact in gametes (sperm and egg cells) which would pass on that signal to the next generation.
And on that note I will leave you with an excellent graphic from an anoymous(e) twitter account which should give you an idea of the scale of the problem that we could be dealing with in terms of heritability of these DNA fragments.
(Jaw-dropping graphic follows)
Interesting and as you say, startling. I stopped reading after a paragraph or two and it took me some time to come back and finish your comment. I'd already had my quota of horrifying news for the week, I guess.
On the other hand, actual harm seems more implied than directly supported here; many modern humans have DNA from Neanderthals, from Denisovans, and for that matter MUCH of our DNA is shared with "lower" lifeforms going back to plants and one-celled animals -- not to mention all the interbreeding among human groups from around the world as people travel, which is ramping up in the modern age but hardly anything new.
Overall, the effects of broadening the human DNA library may not only prevent problems from inbreeding but gradually strengthen the species.
But when you're talking artificially created DNA sequences, all bets are off. And that IS what we're talking about with the mRNA bio-weapons.
In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.
Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the anthropological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.
Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are very different (from those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identity has located populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this and suggest they are not human?
Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.