new here....been watching as a guest for a long time but just created an account
had a thought on this looking at the words in Caps....I may be way off but figured I'd pass this along.....SECOND is 6 characters and NEW is 3....I combined them to 63 and looked up q intel drop #63
To those watching (you know who you are):
You have a choice to make.
You can stand up and do what you know to be right.
Or you can suffer the consequences of your previous actions.
Make no mistake, you are on the losing side.
The choice is yours.
If you decide to take down /pol/ and the net we will be ready.
4920-a 293883 zAj-1 0020192
Alice & Wonderland.
and did the same for KNOW and TEN and looked up Q intel drop #43
These crumbs are not meant to scare anyone but merely inform. Resistance will be dealt with swiftly. The core focus is removing entrenched and fortified bad actors within our federal govt (past and present) as well as others. Simply be diligent - phone numbers will be provided if you witness an uprising or other domestic violence (in addition to 911). Any military seen is for your protection as well as to demonstrate our resolve. Watch for confirmations tomorrow.
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Also a young dog named "Commander".....Chase Young plays for the washington commanders football team....Chase is obviously a bank ....did something happen with JPMorgan Chase bank between October 2022 and Jan 2023?
Unlawful orders being the only orders any military rank is not obligated to follow. Right?
Implied immunity, I wouldn't think, does NOT apply to our elected officials when they break the law?
Am I 100% off the rails on this?
new here....been watching as a guest for a long time but just created an account had a thought on this looking at the words in Caps....I may be way off but figured I'd pass this along.....SECOND is 6 characters and NEW is 3....I combined them to 63 and looked up q intel drop #63
To those watching (you know who you are): You have a choice to make. You can stand up and do what you know to be right. Or you can suffer the consequences of your previous actions. Make no mistake, you are on the losing side. The choice is yours. If you decide to take down /pol/ and the net we will be ready.
4920-a 293883 zAj-1 0020192 Alice & Wonderland.
and did the same for KNOW and TEN and looked up Q intel drop #43
These crumbs are not meant to scare anyone but merely inform. Resistance will be dealt with swiftly. The core focus is removing entrenched and fortified bad actors within our federal govt (past and present) as well as others. Simply be diligent - phone numbers will be provided if you witness an uprising or other domestic violence (in addition to 911). Any military seen is for your protection as well as to demonstrate our resolve. Watch for confirmations tomorrow.
Welcome to the party pal.
thanks
Also if you search the Q intel drops for Eleventh Intel Drop #4529 comes up....not sure how to post it here but found it interesting
https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1276589294010982401
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies? Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless? Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Also a young dog named "Commander".....Chase Young plays for the washington commanders football team....Chase is obviously a bank ....did something happen with JPMorgan Chase bank between October 2022 and Jan 2023?
Or maybe since there are 92 days from Oct 1 to Jan 1....Look at Q intel drops 92, 93, 94, 95....is she calling out the clintons and obama?
Unlawful orders being the only orders any military rank is not obligated to follow. Right? Implied immunity, I wouldn't think, does NOT apply to our elected officials when they break the law? Am I 100% off the rails on this?