which is beside the point -- the OP in an old thread asked a very straightforward question as to whether a particular courtroom video was authentic, and I gave the OP a straightforward answer. (It was authentic.)
The truth value of the testimony in the video was not the issue. To make sense of our current situation, anons need to read and listen to all sorts of information, digest it, filter it, analyze it... and that goes for inaccurate information as well as accurate information.
which is beside the point -- the OP in an old thread asked a very straightforward question as to whether a particular courtroom video was authentic, and I gave the OP a straightforward answer. (It was authentic.)
The truth value of the testimony in the video was not the issue. To make sense of our current situation, anons need to read and listen to all sorts of information, digest it, filter it, analyze it... and that goes for inaccurate information as well as accurate information.