But he was not, he was attacked with obviously fabricated smear. So as far as Anon's analysis, he is just like every other GOP member, and whatever hypothesis you postulate should fit in with that.
Otherwise anytime anyone on our side does anything we find questionable, we can use the same logic "What if he is a pedo?", and that destroys whatever analysis we are doing.
But he was not, he was attacked with obviously fabricated smear. So as far as Anon's analysis, he is just like every other GOP member, and whatever hypothesis you postulate should fit in with that.
Otherwise anytime anyone on our side does anything we find questionable, we can use the same logic "What if he is a pedo?", and that destroys whatever analysis we are doing.