the vaccine that they had the data on, their trials, the one they pimped out, was not the one they gave the public. The public had a different recipe. Sort of a bait and switch. the one the public got, never had any trials. the one they did the trials on, never went to the public.
Yes, in layman's terms during the so called "trials" they used a process (process one) called "naked DNA" to produce the mRNA that the trial participants were injected with.
However, when it went into mass production for the rollout, Pfizer at least (we don't know about the other manufacturers yet I believe) switched to a different process (process two) using an "E - coli DNA" based process for mass manufacturing. However the problem with using the "E - coli DNA" bacteria method is that it then needs separating to filter out other elements of DNA strands, cell membranes, etc. There are legal limits to how much contaminated DNA elements are allowed, something in the 0.003% range (check that because I may be a decimal point out) however scientists have found as much as 30% contaminated fragments of DNA in vials.
But more worrying is the finding of SV40 in the vials, this is a precursor for cancers and should never have been anywhere near the manufacturing process, its inclusion could only mean it was deliberate!
That's as best as I can explain it. For moar, watch Dr Mark Trozzi and the se two videos.
You know the FDA/CDC now state that the jab makers dont have to list ingredients for new (variant) shots because 'they are basically the same'. So is this a cover-up for the 1st 2 batches. We know there were differences in lot number ingredients distributed in the beginning so that everyone dont die at the same time.
Two questions: is this the comirnaty approval with their not being any doses of it available? And what is meant by unacceptably high amounts of DNA plasmids?
No, the recent news is that the billions of doses they put into people’s arms were made through a manufacturing process different from the process used to make the trial product that went into ~21k people’s arms.
So the Trials that they lauded as proving everything was safe and effective were for a different product.
Then they shot a related, but different product into billions of people.
So even if the trials didn’t get fucked up after a few months (they unblinded the placebo group and gave them the shots) they still could not tell us anything about what billions of people are experiencing now.
the vaccine that they had the data on, their trials, the one they pimped out, was not the one they gave the public. The public had a different recipe. Sort of a bait and switch. the one the public got, never had any trials. the one they did the trials on, never went to the public.
Yes, in layman's terms during the so called "trials" they used a process (process one) called "naked DNA" to produce the mRNA that the trial participants were injected with.
However, when it went into mass production for the rollout, Pfizer at least (we don't know about the other manufacturers yet I believe) switched to a different process (process two) using an "E - coli DNA" based process for mass manufacturing. However the problem with using the "E - coli DNA" bacteria method is that it then needs separating to filter out other elements of DNA strands, cell membranes, etc. There are legal limits to how much contaminated DNA elements are allowed, something in the 0.003% range (check that because I may be a decimal point out) however scientists have found as much as 30% contaminated fragments of DNA in vials.
But more worrying is the finding of SV40 in the vials, this is a precursor for cancers and should never have been anywhere near the manufacturing process, its inclusion could only mean it was deliberate!
That's as best as I can explain it. For moar, watch Dr Mark Trozzi and the se two videos.
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/10/05/the-genetic-invasion-of-mankind/
and
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/05/18/dr-trozzi-does-dna-in-the-vials-proves-it-is-a-bioweapon/
I have more info if you require it.
Good summary, thank you
You're welcome.
You know the FDA/CDC now state that the jab makers dont have to list ingredients for new (variant) shots because 'they are basically the same'. So is this a cover-up for the 1st 2 batches. We know there were differences in lot number ingredients distributed in the beginning so that everyone dont die at the same time.
Regardless of the bait and switch, the Pfizer trial that was publicised proved that vaccines were not necessary, were not effective AND were not safe.
Adding bait and switch on top of this is like adding salt to the injury.
Exactly. So this con can't be used to justify a different POTUS brand of vaccine.
Two questions: is this the comirnaty approval with their not being any doses of it available? And what is meant by unacceptably high amounts of DNA plasmids?
No, the recent news is that the billions of doses they put into people’s arms were made through a manufacturing process different from the process used to make the trial product that went into ~21k people’s arms.
So the Trials that they lauded as proving everything was safe and effective were for a different product.
Then they shot a related, but different product into billions of people.
So even if the trials didn’t get fucked up after a few months (they unblinded the placebo group and gave them the shots) they still could not tell us anything about what billions of people are experiencing now.
Thank you, I appreciate it
Here's Dr Campbell interviewing Prof Daglish, lot's more info in it. https://youtu.be/PnJ5T1Enwq4
They basically put shit particles in the batch they released to the masses.
Not kidding.