All true. Except in the case of the Nat Socs I would view that as an indigenous German response to "The Internationalists". The Treaty of Versailles made Germans slaves and paupers in their own homes, and the "International Bankers" ripped through the German economy and stole everything. I think any of us, had we been German and living there at the time, would have become Nat Soc. Take care to not use your 20/20 Hindsight Glasses in looking at it.
In contrast, the Bolsheviks were representatives of those "Internationalists", so they weren't really Russian at all, in my view. Or let's say that if they were Russian, that was not their primary allegiance. Their allegiance was to the early 1900s version of Globohomo.
Then you factor in the failed revolution in 1905, Germany took In thousands of “refugee” Jews from Russia. These people would be the cornerstone for Communist revolution in Germany in the 1920’s. So were they Refugee’s or revolutionary agents? I think history answers the question. I absolutely hate Nazis, that said, operation “Barbarossa” was a preemptive strike against the Soviet’s. If Stalin had gone a different direction with the purges and gulag slave labor he might have been ready and moved against Germany first, either way Germany was to be reduced to rubble. A German/Russia alliance would have been a nightmare for the cabal, assuming Nazi and Soviet ideology had never taken hold. Like in Poland the Soviet’s would have sent much of the population of Germany to work camps “a gentle term” in Russia. I find it tiresome many think when analyzing history means that you must advocate for one side or another like it’s a team sport, if one makes a comment about Russia then you support the Nazis or the other way around. “I’m not talking about you of course, but people in general these days.” Nazi and communism are parallel, competing ideologies not polar opposites like the world has taught since the end of WWII. One is based on a warped patriotism steeped in genetic purity, race thus internalized and projected outward and the other international based on class spreading like an infection of the mind. This is why communism has persisted and Naziism was rejected largely. Both are nothing but a psyop on population’s for control for an elite few. Government’s don’t go to war because of irreconcilable political differences for the most part, governments go to war to destroy what came before and change society into their vision. In a sense war is war on their own people, war is not to preserve a country, it’s value’s, traditions and way of life; but to fundamentally destroy those ideals with government replacing them through the trauma and despair that war brings. It’s not about the past, the present, but the future; after the war itself. One only has to look at 9/11, the Patriot Act and the war on terror. Now we find ourselves enemies of the state, terrorists; why? We are now terrorists because we seek to protect our values, our traditions, our way of life; and for that, we are enemies of the state.
All true. Except in the case of the Nat Socs I would view that as an indigenous German response to "The Internationalists". The Treaty of Versailles made Germans slaves and paupers in their own homes, and the "International Bankers" ripped through the German economy and stole everything. I think any of us, had we been German and living there at the time, would have become Nat Soc. Take care to not use your 20/20 Hindsight Glasses in looking at it.
In contrast, the Bolsheviks were representatives of those "Internationalists", so they weren't really Russian at all, in my view. Or let's say that if they were Russian, that was not their primary allegiance. Their allegiance was to the early 1900s version of Globohomo.
Then you factor in the failed revolution in 1905, Germany took In thousands of “refugee” Jews from Russia. These people would be the cornerstone for Communist revolution in Germany in the 1920’s. So were they Refugee’s or revolutionary agents? I think history answers the question. I absolutely hate Nazis, that said, operation “Barbarossa” was a preemptive strike against the Soviet’s. If Stalin had gone a different direction with the purges and gulag slave labor he might have been ready and moved against Germany first, either way Germany was to be reduced to rubble. A German/Russia alliance would have been a nightmare for the cabal, assuming Nazi and Soviet ideology had never taken hold. Like in Poland the Soviet’s would have sent much of the population of Germany to work camps “a gentle term” in Russia. I find it tiresome many think when analyzing history means that you must advocate for one side or another like it’s a team sport, if one makes a comment about Russia then you support the Nazis or the other way around. “I’m not talking about you of course, but people in general these days.” Nazi and communism are parallel, competing ideologies not polar opposites like the world has taught since the end of WWII. One is based on a warped patriotism steeped in genetic purity, race thus internalized and projected outward and the other international based on class spreading like an infection of the mind. This is why communism has persisted and Naziism was rejected largely. Both are nothing but a psyop on population’s for control for an elite few. Government’s don’t go to war because of irreconcilable political differences for the most part, governments go to war to destroy what came before and change society into their vision. In a sense war is war on their own people, war is not to preserve a country, it’s value’s, traditions and way of life; but to fundamentally destroy those ideals with government replacing them through the trauma and despair that war brings. It’s not about the past, the present, but the future; after the war itself. One only has to look at 9/11, the Patriot Act and the war on terror. Now we find ourselves enemies of the state, terrorists; why? We are now terrorists because we seek to protect our values, our traditions, our way of life; and for that, we are enemies of the state.