Nah, freedom of speech and freedom of worship are Constitutional rights. Where do freedom from want and freedom from fear come from? That's the Democrat/socialist noble sounding perversion of our rights.
I see your point, but inasmuch as speech and worship are Constitutional rights, in context he's talking about 'values', wherein, freedom from want and fear are more moral/ethical/spiritual based.
Yes, but don't you see the manipulating of the language? Now, the government has transformed its duty to protect our Constitutional rights, to protecting something so vague and subjective as "values". Values have been married to and equalled to rights. I don't trust that my values are the same as the Democrats' values and the Muslims and everyone else they are intersectionally connected with. I don't want them in the business of protecting "values" as they define them.
Nah, freedom of speech and freedom of worship are Constitutional rights. Where do freedom from want and freedom from fear come from? That's the Democrat/socialist noble sounding perversion of our rights.
I see your point, but inasmuch as speech and worship are Constitutional rights, in context he's talking about 'values', wherein, freedom from want and fear are more moral/ethical/spiritual based.
Yes, but don't you see the manipulating of the language? Now, the government has transformed its duty to protect our Constitutional rights, to protecting something so vague and subjective as "values". Values have been married to and equalled to rights. I don't trust that my values are the same as the Democrats' values and the Muslims and everyone else they are intersectionally connected with. I don't want them in the business of protecting "values" as they define them.
Can't disagree with your argument, you make a good case.
Good point. The Warmer and Fuzzier, the more we should check the fine print.