I'm sorry to see clickbait disinfo site ThePeople'sVoice being posted and stickied.
Isn't it possible to post the actual data and highlight its value without promoting one of the biggest Disinfo clickbait sites that targets real patriots and spreads disinfo?
__
A bit of discernment goes a long way. Who released this? "Japan"? No. Researchers who happen to live in Japan.
"Official study" Heh? Really? Private researchers at two universities. Official by who?
"...concluded that all Covid variants were engineered in biolabs and intentionally released into the public."
That's really just bullshit. The study made NO SUCH CONCLUSIONS. They track and trace the "unnaturalness" in the evolution process, and conclude the variants could not have emerged by previously recognized biology. They are legit scientists, so they don't make dumb claims (like NewsPunch does).
The study certainly appears to provide some good evidence pointing to the theories that all the variants were bioengineered (which we know it was), and it provides more ammo for exposing the deep state and their scamdemic, but the clickbait headlines - which is what most people seeing this article will focus on - are pure fabrication.
"Considering the current epidemic situation of 245 SARS-CoV-2, it is unlikely that these viruses arose spontaneously. In explaining the formation of the SARS-
246 CoV-2 isolate, as shown here, the SARS-CoV-2 isolates are formed by a completely new mechanism that cannot 247 be explained by previous biology."
"One idea, the hypothesis that these viruses were artificially generated, is more reasonable than proposing 249 a novel mutation acquisition mechanism. However, is there any reason to artificially create these mutants, which 250 are unlikely to have occurred naturally, given the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemic?..."
".....Nonetheless, the analysis we have shown here concludes that the Omicron variants are formed by a 279 completely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology. The way how the SARS-CoV-2 280 mutations occurred should prompt a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
Personally, I wish GAW could take a slightly more mature approach to info sharing, and avoid promoting clickbait disinfo operations without discernment.
The study itself is interesting enough. yes, they investigated and concluded that the various variants could not be accounted for using previous models of natural biological evolution.
It adds to the growing mountains of evidence re: the scamdemic, but it's not exactly a super knock out bombshell.
If one thought there was real value in the information, it would be easy enough to spend a small amount of time to dig and then present the information in a post, rather than posting to an article that exploits the information and the readers.
I think its worth nothing that the articles are set up so that the headline reads in linked posts: "An official new study out of Japan has concluded that all Covid variants were engineered in biolabs and intentionally released into the public." is simply preposterous, and a direct lie.
I hear you. Well reasoned thinking. Really, look at it how a mod at it for a moment. GAW is a wood chipper. You want to keep it humming. Sometimes our researchers need something to destroy thrown in. The sound of a well-oiled machine tearing garbage apart is music to a mod's ears. It means that GAW is ready to DESTROY when the time comes. It's how we know if we're on point, or if we've lost our way
hahahhaha. Uh, OK. Wood chipper. Keeping it humming. OK. Look, that put a smile on my face.
However.....
One concern I have here is that proportionally speaking, how much of the board takes the bullshit clickbait headlines apart, and how much of the board just upvotes, takes the fake news at face value (and possibly even then promotes it by linking on their social media etc?).
There are close to 400 upvotes for this post, 3 downvotes, and a bunch of comments. I'm wondering what portion of those 400 upvotes are from pedes who didn't discern the fake news nature of the headlines.
I love the idea of ripping garbage to shreds, and I and others will continue to point out the bullshite when The People's Voice rears its ugly head on GAW. I know that a sticky does NOT mean an endorsement and that sometimes our (great) mod team stickies content because its worth being put under scrutiny.
However, isn't there also a need to balance the advantages of posting garbage content for us to sharpen our teeth on and the disadvantages of inspiring a large number of pedes to swallow content that is deliberately designed to manipulate and deceive?
Proportionally, how many of our pedes actually just read the headline and upvoted fake news, vs. how many went into it to apply discernment?
Personally, I think this question is worth considering.
Hopefully, the discussion around how to deal with disinfo and clickbait can evolve. Personally, I think that clickbait and disinfo that targets us is a serious issue that needs a more serious response. For the 400 upvotes on GAW that this fake news TPV article post garners, how many hundreds of thousands of truth seekers out there are diverted and subverted by the TPV operation? How many disinfo operations are there targeting us - the whole Q community?
A pretty big issue in a 5G information war, imo.
But moving on. A well oiled machine needs a bit of fine tuning now and then. Hopefully this discussion can aid that process.
I'm sorry to see clickbait disinfo site ThePeople'sVoice being posted and stickied.
Isn't it possible to post the actual data and highlight its value without promoting one of the biggest Disinfo clickbait sites that targets real patriots and spreads disinfo?
__
A bit of discernment goes a long way. Who released this? "Japan"? No. Researchers who happen to live in Japan.
"Official study" Heh? Really? Private researchers at two universities. Official by who?
"...concluded that all Covid variants were engineered in biolabs and intentionally released into the public."
That's really just bullshit. The study made NO SUCH CONCLUSIONS. They track and trace the "unnaturalness" in the evolution process, and conclude the variants could not have emerged by previously recognized biology. They are legit scientists, so they don't make dumb claims (like NewsPunch does).
The study certainly appears to provide some good evidence pointing to the theories that all the variants were bioengineered (which we know it was), and it provides more ammo for exposing the deep state and their scamdemic, but the clickbait headlines - which is what most people seeing this article will focus on - are pure fabrication.
https://zenodo.org/record/8254894
FYI, from the actual study:
"Considering the current epidemic situation of 245 SARS-CoV-2, it is unlikely that these viruses arose spontaneously. In explaining the formation of the SARS- 246 CoV-2 isolate, as shown here, the SARS-CoV-2 isolates are formed by a completely new mechanism that cannot 247 be explained by previous biology."
"One idea, the hypothesis that these viruses were artificially generated, is more reasonable than proposing 249 a novel mutation acquisition mechanism. However, is there any reason to artificially create these mutants, which 250 are unlikely to have occurred naturally, given the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemic?..."
".....Nonetheless, the analysis we have shown here concludes that the Omicron variants are formed by a 279 completely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology. The way how the SARS-CoV-2 280 mutations occurred should prompt a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
Personally, I wish GAW could take a slightly more mature approach to info sharing, and avoid promoting clickbait disinfo operations without discernment.
But maybe that's just me.
PS. Comment edited
Agreed, the people's voice is known click bait. If this is true information it should be sourced from somewhere else to protect credibility.
The study itself is interesting enough. yes, they investigated and concluded that the various variants could not be accounted for using previous models of natural biological evolution.
It adds to the growing mountains of evidence re: the scamdemic, but it's not exactly a super knock out bombshell.
If one thought there was real value in the information, it would be easy enough to spend a small amount of time to dig and then present the information in a post, rather than posting to an article that exploits the information and the readers.
I think its worth nothing that the articles are set up so that the headline reads in linked posts: "An official new study out of Japan has concluded that all Covid variants were engineered in biolabs and intentionally released into the public." is simply preposterous, and a direct lie.
I am with you on this.
I hear you. Well reasoned thinking. Really, look at it how a mod at it for a moment. GAW is a wood chipper. You want to keep it humming. Sometimes our researchers need something to destroy thrown in. The sound of a well-oiled machine tearing garbage apart is music to a mod's ears. It means that GAW is ready to DESTROY when the time comes. It's how we know if we're on point, or if we've lost our way
hahahhaha. Uh, OK. Wood chipper. Keeping it humming. OK. Look, that put a smile on my face.
However.....
One concern I have here is that proportionally speaking, how much of the board takes the bullshit clickbait headlines apart, and how much of the board just upvotes, takes the fake news at face value (and possibly even then promotes it by linking on their social media etc?).
There are close to 400 upvotes for this post, 3 downvotes, and a bunch of comments. I'm wondering what portion of those 400 upvotes are from pedes who didn't discern the fake news nature of the headlines.
I love the idea of ripping garbage to shreds, and I and others will continue to point out the bullshite when The People's Voice rears its ugly head on GAW. I know that a sticky does NOT mean an endorsement and that sometimes our (great) mod team stickies content because its worth being put under scrutiny.
However, isn't there also a need to balance the advantages of posting garbage content for us to sharpen our teeth on and the disadvantages of inspiring a large number of pedes to swallow content that is deliberately designed to manipulate and deceive?
Proportionally, how many of our pedes actually just read the headline and upvoted fake news, vs. how many went into it to apply discernment?
Personally, I think this question is worth considering.
Hopefully, the discussion around how to deal with disinfo and clickbait can evolve. Personally, I think that clickbait and disinfo that targets us is a serious issue that needs a more serious response. For the 400 upvotes on GAW that this fake news TPV article post garners, how many hundreds of thousands of truth seekers out there are diverted and subverted by the TPV operation? How many disinfo operations are there targeting us - the whole Q community?
A pretty big issue in a 5G information war, imo.
But moving on. A well oiled machine needs a bit of fine tuning now and then. Hopefully this discussion can aid that process.
Note: GAW mode team rocks.
good analysis pede