-
Israel chose to ignore intelligence from Egyptian officials about a major attack coming from Hamas.
-
Multiple former IDF soldiers & Israeli intelligence personnel have come forward online and said there’s a zero percent chance Israel was unaware of this attack beforehand or couldn’t have prevented it.
-
We just watched unsophisticated terrorists on hang gliders soar into one of the most heavily-defended & surveilled countries on the planet.
-
Within 48 hours of the attack, we’re now suddenly seeing enormous support for an American war with Iran and the genocide of the Palestinian people.
I’m witnessing American pastors and formerly level-headed influencers in our world completely lose their minds and call for genocide. It’s unsurprising, but insane to watch.
If the events of the past three years have taught me anything, it’s that when people get whipped into an emotional frenzy, critical thinking completely goes out the window.
People become highly suggestible and will rush to extremely dangerous conclusions without thinking about the consequences. I think this is what we’re all witnessing with this situation in Israel.
I’m reminded of Pearl Harbor and 9/11. In both scenarios, the American government received intelligence in advance of the attacks, but chose not to prevent the attacks. Why?
The American government was willing to sacrifice the lives of American citizens in order to advance its geopolitical goals.
Pearl Harbor gave the justification to enter WWII.
9/11 gave justification to invade the Middle East & drastically expand the American military industrial complex & our surveillance apparatus.
They were brutal & extremely traumatic events for the American public to witness. The emotional trauma caused people to get whipped into an emotional frenzy.
America wanted ONE THING in response to these attacks: The blood of our enemies. I see the same psyop playing out now. People are whipped into a frenzied bloodlust.
In their frenzied bloodlust, people are overlooking some SERIOUSLY important facts here, notably:
-
The fact that none of this adds up,
-
Innocent civilians are being threatened with genocide, and
-
Escalated violence in the Middle East and a war with Iran both risk the rest of the planet getting dragged into WWIII.
What happened in Israel this weekend was obviously gut-wrenching and awful to witness, but I do not trust Israel’s so-called “intelligence failure”, nor do I trust the snakes in Washington calling for war with Iran, & I sure as hell no longer trust any of the emotionally-frenzied influencers calling for explicit genocide of innocent civilians.
This was a defining moment in history, similar to Pearl Harbor, 9/11, COVID, the beginning of the Ukraine war, etc, and a lot of people just got played. Hard.
People responded by going full mask-off, exposing themselves as reckless & incapable of exercising sound judgment in moments of chaos and heightened emotion.
And we’re now at the brink of WWIII because of it. This is all worth noting.
There’s a high likelihood there will be more chaos throughout the rest of this decade. There will be more psychological operations.
There will be more moments in time in which cooler heads ought to prevail, but people will get whipped into an emotional frenzy instead.
Keep your wits about you, & be cautious in whom you allow yourself to be influenced by.
Recognize that governments & intelligence agencies spend enormous resources waging psychological operations on social media nonstop when stuff like this goes down.
Remember that when chaos is at its peak, history shows there is ALMOST ALWAYS a hidden agenda being played out, & that hidden agenda is ALWAYS designed to prey on our base emotions to facilitate a desired end-result.
Pray for world peace tonight.
Thanks. 🤙
Imported from: https://twitter.com/sovereignbrah/status/1711578357253456181
I appreciate your questions and concerns. Let's address each of your claims and questions one by one.
Assembly of the New Testament: It's true that the New Testament books were written over several decades after the life of Jesus. However, the process of assembling the New Testament canon was a careful one. Early Christians recognized writings that were considered authoritative and inspired by God. The process of canonization took place over centuries, with criteria like apostolic authorship or close association with apostles and conformity to orthodox Christian doctrine being used. The New Testament books were widely accepted by the early Christian communities.
Authorship of New Testament Books: While there may be some debate about the authorship of a few New Testament books, the majority of them have traditionally been attributed to apostles or close associates of apostles. For instance, the letters of Paul are well-documented, and he claimed authorship in many of them.
Paul's Letters: Paul's letters to the early churches were intended to provide guidance and address specific issues within those communities. Over time, they were recognized as valuable teachings inspired by the Holy Spirit, which is why they are included in the New Testament.
Jesus and the New Testament: It's important to note that Jesus' primary focus was on proclaiming the Kingdom of God, fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies, and establishing a new covenant through His sacrifice. He didn't specifically reference the compilation of a New Testament because His ministry was centered on His own teachings and the fulfillment of the Old Testament Scriptures.
Canonization and the Catholic Church: The role of the Catholic Church in the canonization process is historically significant. The early Church councils, including the Councils of Hippo and Carthage, played a role in affirming the canon of the New Testament. However, it's essential to understand that the recognition of these books was based on their widespread acceptance by Christian communities.
Translation and King James Version: The translation of the Bible into English, including the King James Version (KJV), was a significant development. While King James I was involved in commissioning the KJV, it was carried out by a group of scholars who aimed to provide an accurate translation of the Bible into English. The choice of the term "word" in the KJV for "logos" is a translation choice but doesn't necessarily diminish the deeper theological concept of "logos."
Logos: You are correct that the Greek term "logos" has a broader meaning than just "word." It encompasses the divine reasoning and plan of God, as well as the ordering principle of the universe. This concept is reflected in John 1:1, where Jesus is referred to as the "Word" who was with God from the beginning.
Infallibility: The belief in the infallibility of the Bible is a matter of theological interpretation. Many Christians hold that the Bible is divinely inspired and contains truths necessary for salvation. However, interpretations may vary on specific passages, and not all Christians interpret the Bible in the same way.
You aptly ask:
In the Gospel of John, Jesus indeed promises the coming of the Holy Spirit, often referred to as the "Helper" or "Comforter." This promise is found in John 14:26 (NIV):
This promise of the Holy Spirit was given to the disciples to help them recall and understand the teachings of Jesus. It played a crucial role in their ability to accurately convey His message to others, including through the writing of the New Testament.
The idea is that the Holy Spirit guided the early Christians, including the apostles, in their understanding of Jesus' teachings and in recording them. This divine guidance and inspiration are seen as the basis for the authority of the New Testament writings. So, while Jesus may not have explicitly referenced a future book, He did promise the guidance of the Holy Spirit to ensure that His teachings were accurately transmitted to future generations.
Hope this helps.