Why is Israel bombing civvies and not military installations? Sounds like a war crime to me!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
lol at the comments defending bombing civilians.
let's say they are harboring weapons in residential areas, why not send in such an "elite" army? Instead of leveling the buildings competely
The infamous Palestinian Jeffrey Epstein lived in a residential building in. Manhattan, should that be blown up as well? Or is that different?
How about Vegas Shooter, why not just blow up the hotel and casino he used?
"only Israel can target civilians!!! REEEE"
You’re right and I do believe this is about committing genocide with the world’s approval
It's the same excuse used to keep these people in an open air prison and limit medical supplies and construction materials. Just in case they might want to build a bomb.
At the moment, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran are all on the same page, and that page says "Death to Israel," which is unmistakable genocide. They are receiving widespread approval or silent toleration throughout the world. The U.S. government gifted Iran $6 billion to facilitate its strategies, and (as I have read recently) offered $ millions to Palestine. So, yes, it is about committing genocide against Israel with the world's approval.
both sides are guilty of targeting civilians in this conflict, are they not?
Why add the negative question at the end Socrates?
Yes? No?
both sides are targeting civilians but the world is cheering on the side with the money, power, weapons, and famous pedophiles.
I guess the purpose of my question and the discussion on this board is to craft our argument. I just replied to another with the same sentiment. I will copy pasta
I agree this is a setup, that is the argument we need to stick with. But, damn this will be much more difficult to turn public opinion on this one in comparison to ukraine. Even ukraine was tough for a while.
Debating helps me formulate my understanding of things. I think it helps all of us. GA is a great place for honest debate. A lot less trolly than an article comment section thanks to the mods.
They are not. Hamas/Gaza has a positive obligation under international law not to use human shields, which are forbidden as a tactic. Israel has no moral or legal obligation to do anything other than target their military forces or capabilities, wherever they are located. (In other words, the enforcement of the prohibition against human shields is that no one has to regard the welfare of the shields.)
The only moral question is whether Hamas has any right to use human shields, when there is worldwide acceptance of such use being illegitimate. There is no violation of international agreements by engaging the enemy, wherever the enemy is located.
Nor is the attacked party under any obligation to become a pretzel in order to avoid civilian casualties which were the responsibility of the attacker to preclude. It doesn't matter if Hamas was a government with a Pentagon, or mere rabble.
what do human shields have to do with bombing residential apartment complexes?
"only Israel is allowed to murder civilians!"
When Hamas sets up offices or headquarters in apartment complexes. The Israelis recently bombed a building at the local university, because it was being used for this purpose, as well as being an armory for ammunition. It is an old trick by the Ukrainians to use human shields, and Hamas is just borrowing the playbook, putting armed forces (a legitimate target) among civilians, and when they are bombed, cry "Israel is murdering civilians!" And gullible types sing their song.
does the same logic go for Hamas targeting civilians?
If a senior military commander lives in an apartment complex we can blow up the whole thing right? The whole block, no need to just stop at one building.
Or is that different?
Epstein ran a child trafficking ring from his apartment in Manhattan, should we blow up that building as well?