Why is Israel bombing civvies and not military installations? Sounds like a war crime to me!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
Well...... lets look at the attack. Was the attack directed and sent form the civilian markets?
Hamas is coming INTO Isreal. So... logically, one would STOP the invaders FIRST.
One would not BOMB civilians in an unrelated area prior to fortifying ones own line.
The attack, the surprise, the response... nothing makes reasonable sense no matter how one looks at it.
I agree with this statement. I just don't think the civilians being affected is the best argument, because it is somewhat hyprocritical for both sides.
I agree this is a setup, that is the argument we need to stick with. But, damn this will be much more difficult to turn public opinion on this one in comparison to ukraine. Even ukraine was tough for a while.
Where the attack was sent from has no relevance to how to proceed. All military targets are legitimate, no matter whence the originate.
To deal with the situation it would be necessary to (1) repel or kill the invaders, and (2) simultaneously eliminate their capability to attack from long range. There is no reason to wait for either measure. Doing so would be illogical.
There is no indication that Israel is bombing civilians by choice. If it bombs known or suspected Hamas operating units, it does not matter if civilians are present. Hamas has a positive obligation under either the Geneva or Hague convention to segregate its forces from its population. They do not get to use human shields, and the enforcement of that principle is that there is no war crime involved in shooting back at the enemy if they are embedded in the public.
The response makes perfect sense.