I'll note that Trump is supporting Israel for face value but recently told allies he wants bibi impeached? Obviously he knows Israel was doing another inside job.
Looking up "but recently told allies he wants bibi impeached?" yields a bunch of israeli msm papers regurgitating a ROLLING STONES article claiming this. THat's their only sauce. Essentially, they are making news of reporting an anti-trump magazine reporting that story.
Can we really give much credence to a one-article by Trump hating Rolling Stones citing "private conversations" but no actual details of who the sources are?
They could easily simply make this up, or some of the sources could just make that up and tell Rolling Stones, or both.
Looks a lot like propaganda to me. I mean, the narrative that "trump told allies he wants Net. impeached".
For starters, the Israeli system doesn't 'impeach' a PM in the way the US system does. So the narrative makes Trump look stupid, which is what their audience laps up.
Can we? Lol of course we can. As long as it confirms our bias. You new here? Lol but seriously it’s not like this place is magically immune to bias just because someone slapped a big Q on top of the page.
He was critical of Bibi. No dispute about that. The point I was making is that there seems no substantial basis to the narrative that "Trump is telling allies that he wants Bibi impeached." It is a narrative being spread by ONE globalist newspaper, one of the worst. Do yu take that seriously? I don't.
And I think Trump only disputes certain things where he has a very specific reason for doing so. If he refuted every fake story created by the Leftist Globalist media, he'd be posting on Truth 300 times a day!
I'll note that Trump is supporting Israel for face value but recently told allies he wants bibi impeached? Obviously he knows Israel was doing another inside job.
Looking up "but recently told allies he wants bibi impeached?" yields a bunch of israeli msm papers regurgitating a ROLLING STONES article claiming this. THat's their only sauce. Essentially, they are making news of reporting an anti-trump magazine reporting that story.
Can we really give much credence to a one-article by Trump hating Rolling Stones citing "private conversations" but no actual details of who the sources are?
They could easily simply make this up, or some of the sources could just make that up and tell Rolling Stones, or both.
Looks a lot like propaganda to me. I mean, the narrative that "trump told allies he wants Net. impeached".
For starters, the Israeli system doesn't 'impeach' a PM in the way the US system does. So the narrative makes Trump look stupid, which is what their audience laps up.
Can we? Lol of course we can. As long as it confirms our bias. You new here? Lol but seriously it’s not like this place is magically immune to bias just because someone slapped a big Q on top of the page.
Well, exactly, but I was attempting to be tactful.
he usually refutes something on truth if it isn't the case. Maybe he wants it in the open that BiBi must go.
He was critical of Bibi. No dispute about that. The point I was making is that there seems no substantial basis to the narrative that "Trump is telling allies that he wants Bibi impeached." It is a narrative being spread by ONE globalist newspaper, one of the worst. Do yu take that seriously? I don't.
And I think Trump only disputes certain things where he has a very specific reason for doing so. If he refuted every fake story created by the Leftist Globalist media, he'd be posting on Truth 300 times a day!
True, time will tell. Bibi has shown his true colours along time ago.