Trouble is the land area of Earth is 57million square miles. There are 640 acres to a square mile making 36Billion acres, meaning each of the 8Billion people spread out would have 4.5 acres.
When you delete deserts and land too high to use, or too cold like northern Siberia or Canada and delete Antarctica you are left with a DEPRESSINGLY tiny amount of land per person.
I once worked it out carefully and with everyone standing in a grid on the usable land your neighbours are about 100 metres away (many ways to calculate this).
Everyone with 1 square foot is one thing, viable living space is another.
So, a little over two acres per person? That’s not too bad.
From there, we can take families being a group of 2-5, to get them living on 5-10 acres, easily.
It’s highly doubtful they have that 8 billion number correct, but could be manageable.
One thing is for sure, the numbers would correct themselves naturally if it wasn’t, as opposed to “trust us” and unnaturally, like they’re trying to do now.
Yes it self corrects if left alone. I have a theory that population was made to explode artificially. The obvious example is Africa where the west stepped in to avert famine but from that point on used it as a dumping ground for agricultural surpluses, making them dependent and removing the impetus to innovate and adapt. Their population exploded from the mid 80's, before that it was quite small.
But more generally I assumed they wanted a global increase to 1. make money from larger markets, 2. create a need for eugenic programmes directed artificially by them (mass sterilisation by transmissible disease created by them or perhaps that was the covax). 3. have a large population necessitating "global solutions" that they direct
Eventually there will be a correction whether directed by them or as a result of a general collapse of the support systems they built (if they are in control then the wisdom of the following epoch will be "don't let population get out of control again" which will mean breeding licences
Trouble is the land area of Earth is 57million square miles. There are 640 acres to a square mile making 36Billion acres, meaning each of the 8Billion people spread out would have 4.5 acres.
When you delete deserts and land too high to use, or too cold like northern Siberia or Canada and delete Antarctica you are left with a DEPRESSINGLY tiny amount of land per person.
I once worked it out carefully and with everyone standing in a grid on the usable land your neighbours are about 100 metres away (many ways to calculate this).
Everyone with 1 square foot is one thing, viable living space is another.
So, a little over two acres per person? That’s not too bad.
From there, we can take families being a group of 2-5, to get them living on 5-10 acres, easily.
It’s highly doubtful they have that 8 billion number correct, but could be manageable. One thing is for sure, the numbers would correct themselves naturally if it wasn’t, as opposed to “trust us” and unnaturally, like they’re trying to do now.
Yes it self corrects if left alone. I have a theory that population was made to explode artificially. The obvious example is Africa where the west stepped in to avert famine but from that point on used it as a dumping ground for agricultural surpluses, making them dependent and removing the impetus to innovate and adapt. Their population exploded from the mid 80's, before that it was quite small.
But more generally I assumed they wanted a global increase to 1. make money from larger markets, 2. create a need for eugenic programmes directed artificially by them (mass sterilisation by transmissible disease created by them or perhaps that was the covax). 3. have a large population necessitating "global solutions" that they direct
Eventually there will be a correction whether directed by them or as a result of a general collapse of the support systems they built (if they are in control then the wisdom of the following epoch will be "don't let population get out of control again" which will mean breeding licences
Still means global warming works out to a net positive