You might think it's bogus. I might even think it's bogus. I'm sure President Trump thinks it's bogus.
But the judge sure as hell won't and will be the one to deal with it.
Again, if he thinks it's bogus, he can respond with the appropriate LEGAL methods. And that bit of nonsense above will not only get President Trump in further hot water, but the person(s) doing it on his behalf will certainly be in legal trouble over it as well.
People need to start being able to differentiate between opinions we hold personally and the facts of the legal system.
It doesn't matter if you or anyone else on this board thinks it's bogus or not. The judges involved in these cases are those whose opinions matter here.
Don't like that? Arguing with me won't change anything. Find some ways to make a difference. And sitting on a board, talking to a group where around 95% of the members agree with you won't make a difference.
I'm sure Trump's lawyers have already figured out how they want to respond, legally.
So, if you care about it, go find a way to make a difference. How you do that is up to you.
Become a well-known media personality.
Become a best-selling author and write something that will sway the opinions of others.
Become a lawyer and fight against the laws you think are unconstitutional.
Become a judge and help others out in similar situations.
I volunteer my time to several things I think makes a difference. Helping illiterate homeless and poor people learn how to read is one. That way they can read the Constitution themselves and learn how laws are made and which politician is saying and doing what.
Reading is extraordinarily important in learning things such as what a peraon's civil rights are.
Suggesting ways people can help make a difference if they really care about the issue isn't really "telling everyone else what to do".
A bogus gag order that should be ignored by large?
You might think it's bogus. I might even think it's bogus. I'm sure President Trump thinks it's bogus.
But the judge sure as hell won't and will be the one to deal with it.
Again, if he thinks it's bogus, he can respond with the appropriate LEGAL methods. And that bit of nonsense above will not only get President Trump in further hot water, but the person(s) doing it on his behalf will certainly be in legal trouble over it as well.
People need to start being able to differentiate between opinions we hold personally and the facts of the legal system.
It doesn't matter if you or anyone else on this board thinks it's bogus or not. The judges involved in these cases are those whose opinions matter here.
Don't like that? Arguing with me won't change anything. Find some ways to make a difference. And sitting on a board, talking to a group where around 95% of the members agree with you won't make a difference.
I'm sure Trump's lawyers have already figured out how they want to respond, legally.
So, if you care about it, go find a way to make a difference. How you do that is up to you.
Become a well-known media personality. Become a best-selling author and write something that will sway the opinions of others. Become a lawyer and fight against the laws you think are unconstitutional. Become a judge and help others out in similar situations.
There are plenty of ways to make a difference.
I'm just curious, what way are YOU making a difference? Seems like your sitting here on this board telling everyone else what to do.
I volunteer my time to several things I think makes a difference. Helping illiterate homeless and poor people learn how to read is one. That way they can read the Constitution themselves and learn how laws are made and which politician is saying and doing what.
Reading is extraordinarily important in learning things such as what a peraon's civil rights are.
Suggesting ways people can help make a difference if they really care about the issue isn't really "telling everyone else what to do".
A bogus judge? Lol
I'm pretty sure the judge is real.
So you're a lawyer then?
Nope. Is everyone else here giving their opinions lawyers?
But I am forming my opinions based on what lawyers have said.
You said it - with such authority - I assumed you knew definitively.