222 Judge Tanya Chutkan has imposed a limited gag order on Trump, restricting him from making public statements in relation to his D.C. court case. (www.weirtondailytimes.com) posted 1 year ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid 1 year ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid +222 / -0 Trump has narrow gag order imposed on him by federal judge overseeing 2020 election subversion case WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge overseeing the 2020 election subversion case against Donald Trump in Washington imposed a narrow gag order on him on Monda 84 comments share 84 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Just because something is done doesn't make it any less unconstitutional.
Gun control exists and is used in the U.S.; it doesn't make it suddenly Constitutional.
The Supreme Court has upheld those gun control laws, though. And the Supreme Court is who decides what is unconstitutional.
I don't agree with them, but I don't get to decide things like that. Which makes it important who gets to elect SC judges.
Just like I didn't agree with Roe vs Wade. But during the past 50 years, it was constitutional. Now it's not.
Until the laws change, gag orders are not unconstitutional as a whole.
The Supreme Court has actually struck down most gun control laws, and others take time and pressure to even reach SCOTUS.
You know, I'm starting to believe you do.
No, I really don't. I was under the impression that the SC had upheld gun control laws.
If they haven't, then I was wrong.
I suppose because it's left up to the state and not federal? I don't know.
Even so, it doesn't void the fact that there are limitations on free speech.
Edited to add: here is a link with the SC upholding some gun control laws.
https://www.justia.com/constitutional-law/gun-rights-under-the-constitution/#:~:text=It%20found%20that%20the%20government,mental%20illnesses%20and%20convicted%20felons.