In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump."
administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath?
What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist?
One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons.
Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump." administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
All of his writings are open source. https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath? What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist? One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons. Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."