Then this disinformation only serves to strengthen the enemies opinion that Q is BS and lower moral for followers. What would the purpose of this be, especially when the movement in general is dwindling.
"Here's my take on Q ... I believe it is a major psyop and from what I can tell, it or they or whatever or whoever is "running this op" has done a major disservice. What I see are a bunch of people sitting and waiting for something to happen instead of doing what I have been callling for now for quite some time (LOCAL ACTION)..."
That is the definition of disavowment. He does not support the Q movement and is explicitly stating so.
Flynn is telling us the same exact thing Q did. Except he cannot acknowledge the op directly. So instead he has to come at it from the overall current interpretation by the community (much larger than GAW), which must be telling him that we are waiting for someone to fix everything so we can go back to business as usual.
So he is saying, fine. If that is what you got out of the op, then it was a disservice.
No where does he say it was "bad", evil, black hat, or that he "disavows it".
Did not happen.
Reported on Here yesterday
Then this disinformation only serves to strengthen the enemies opinion that Q is BS and lower moral for followers. What would the purpose of this be, especially when the movement in general is dwindling.
I know what you are thinking of, but that absolutely was not a disavowment.
"Here's my take on Q ... I believe it is a major psyop and from what I can tell, it or they or whatever or whoever is "running this op" has done a major disservice. What I see are a bunch of people sitting and waiting for something to happen instead of doing what I have been callling for now for quite some time (LOCAL ACTION)..."
That is the definition of disavowment. He does not support the Q movement and is explicitly stating so.
He is staying he don't agree with the sit back and do nothing. That is all
It is a psyop. 🤷🏼♂️
Flynn is telling us the same exact thing Q did. Except he cannot acknowledge the op directly. So instead he has to come at it from the overall current interpretation by the community (much larger than GAW), which must be telling him that we are waiting for someone to fix everything so we can go back to business as usual.
So he is saying, fine. If that is what you got out of the op, then it was a disservice.
No where does he say it was "bad", evil, black hat, or that he "disavows it".