Analyzing General Flynn's Reply to UltraMJ
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You’re right and you don’t have to waste a second trying to figure out what local action means.
All I’m saying, maybe not well, is we shouldn’t let what he said to Dave, and what he tweeted about Q being a psyop disturb us. But, I get we’re Anons and we instinctively dig into things.
What I don’t like, and it really just became clear to me, is his comments might turn off people who were in the process of opening their eyes to Q.
The good news is the larger MAGA community is growing. Maybe most of them will never specifically believe in Q, but they are awake to the reality of an evil DS.
I like it. I admit to being what I have termed "a hopeful skeptic". I've been in the intel world and inside SAPs and understand first hand how difficult it is to maintain OPSEC. The more people who know and the longer the operation goes, the higher the probability of compromise. I am skeptical that such a 10 person crew exists and can initiate and control operations without compromise over the many years claimed.
However, I earnestly hope that there exists some set of men who are of the character of the Founders - pledging lives, fortunes and sacred honor to the restoration of our once glorious Republic. I believe those are not 10 cloistered mystery men, but are the embodiment of MAGA
https://x.com/prolotario1/status/1715464983624953883?s=61 Something is happening on X with this acct Ariel.